Era uma vez uma nação chamada Pérsia. Eles deram refúgio a 4.000 muçulmanos e, 100 anos depois, todos os Persas haviam sido exterminados.
Hoje, essa nação é o Irã.
Eu só achei que você deveria saber.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza is getting worse. Heavy rain. Flooded tents. The reality on the ground is heartbreaking.
The UK government will not stand by. We will not rest until we bring an end to the intolerable suffering.
👏 MINISTER LEFT SQUIRMING AS SUSANNA REID CALLS OUT THE HYPOCRISY: TOUGH ON BRAND & WALLIAMS, SILENT ON GROOMING GANGS
Politicians are falling over themselves to look tough on the Russell Brand and David Walliams scandals, demanding action, talking about abuse of power, insisting things must change. Meanwhile Maggie Oliver is still screaming from the rooftops about the grooming gangs and child sexual exploitation recommendations that remain unimplemented after years of empty promises and lip service.
She was on @GMB again yesterday pleading with Andy Burnham and the government to finally do something. Then Susanna Reid put the same question directly to the Victims Minister. The exchange was revealing.
Reid said:
“There can be no more abhorrent abuse of power than that committed in the grooming gangs scandal when children were abused. Maggie Oliver says that the government is still letting those children down by not implementing all of the recommendations of a multi-million-pound inquiry into grooming gangs. How do you defend the fact that those 20 or so recommendations are not implemented?”
The minister totally ignored the question. Instead of addressing the unimplemented recommendations, she repeated the familiar lines, the grooming gangs scandal is one of the biggest stains on our history as a nation, that money has been invested to support victims, and that a national inquiry has been launched. We already know how scandalous it was. That was not what she was asked!
Reid kept pressing, asking what the minister would say to Maggie Oliver, who is so critical of the government’s failures, and pointing out the glaring double standard like putting heavy pressure on the media and entertainment industry over Brand and Walliams, while this sits ignored on the government’s own desk.
The minister’s response is a disgrace. She said this is on all of us. On society as a whole. Not just the media, not just people in positions of power and influence, on everyone.
That is infuriating. No. It is on you and your government to implement what has already been recommended by those who have done the work. Society has been screaming about grooming gangs for decades. You have had the reports, the inquiries, the recommendations. You have not acted. Do not dare pin your deliberate inaction on “society”.
Reid didn’t let it go. She came back to the recommendations and asked why they haven’t been implemented. Are they too complicated? Unenforceable? Too expensive? Why not simply demand that they are implemented?
The answer: “It’s complicated.”
This is shameless. Opportunistic hypocrites who are all over the celebrity scandals, demanding this and that must be done, while still ignoring one of the biggest abuse scandals in this country’s history. Absolute disgrace. Unforgivable.
DISGUSTING: The U.N. has just elected the Islamic Republic of Iran to its committee responsible for shaping the agenda on human rights, women’s rights, and counterterrorism.
144 countries voted in favor.
The United Nations has become a complete joke.
I read the reports coming out of Manchester this morning and I am genuinely speechless.
Andy Burnham’s old political machine has just been caught secretly intercepting and censoring emails sent by the public to elected politicians.
What were those emails actually about? A resident was asking hard questions about the £55 million in taxpayer loans Burnham handed to Abu Dhabi property developers when he was Mayor, with zero affordable housing requirements.
Instead of letting elected councillors read the concerns of their constituents, unelected bureaucrats quietly diverted the emails straight to the legal department to be buried.
The politicians had absolutely no idea their personal inboxes were being filtered by the state.
The council claims they had to intercept the messages because of potential litigation. It is a complete lie.
Internal correspondence proves the city solicitor asked for this specific resident to be blocked months before any legal threat even existed.
You vote for local representatives to hold the system accountable. But the second a citizen asks where Burnham sent public money in a Gulf state property deal, his political syndicate builds a secret digital firewall to protect the investment.
This is not a functioning democracy. This is a captured corporate cartel running a cover-up for the Prime Minister, and the national media is letting them get away with it in broad daylight.
This AI video has 350k likes on TikTok.
350,000 people believe there’s a snowstorm in Gaza and that people are freezing to death.
The lowest-IQ movement in history.
@Phil_Bazz I've never understood this either, you don't go to the cinema & leave before the end of the film bc you dont know how it will end same applies to footy. Beat the traffic excuse is nonsense, what for, get home for their tea or sit in the pub, they can do that any time
The Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND.
The Working Group held a consultation so people could help shape what became the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition. Given the public interest, the FSU asked which groups and individuals had been consulted.
Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy submitted a Freedom of Information request. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) replied that it had deleted all the responses — in what appears to be against the Government’s own data policy.
The FSU then threatened Angela Rayner’s department with legal action.
Now the department’s most senior civil servant says the responses do exist and remain on its data system, but the department will not disclose who was consulted.
So what is going on? Were we told the responses had been deleted to conceal the fact that Islamist extremists had the chance to influence the definition?
We are now told that an Islamophobia tsar will be announced imminently. Given Rayner and her department’s record, who on earth could it be?