Tim Crowther

It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog

[Jen k 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Jenny_1884]

This government can’t have it both ways.

If a State Pension is being classed as a benefit then it should not be used as part of your tax allowance as benefits are non taxable.

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

🚨 BOOM! Nick Ferrari just put Deputy PM David Lammy on the ropes LIVE on LBC! 🔥

“Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”

Lammy instantly flustered, stuttering like he’s been caught red-handed:

“Uhh… well I, look, I, I, I, I think… to honour what’s that family…”

Ferrari cuts through the waffle:

“It’s a yes or no, Mr Lammy. Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”

Lammy, clearly squirming:

“I think… no. Because, look, I don’t think the family are asking for symbolism. They’re asking for genuine common sense policing and a reduction in knife crime.”

Ferrari pounces:

“So you agree, taking the knee is mere symbolism? It was a bit of a charade at times?”

Lammy’s brain completely melts:

“That was a moment back then when we were still in the pandemic. This is today. This is this particular incident in our country that’s heart-rending.”

The pandemic?! What the actual f*ck has COVID got to do with it? 😂 His head had totally gone. Nick Ferrari absolutely broke him on air.

This is the same David Lammy who was one of the biggest cheerleaders for BLM, repeatedly defended taking the knee, slammed anyone who questioned it, and pushed the George Floyd narrative hard, yet suddenly it’s all “symbolism” and excuses when it’s a young British lad stabbed to death.

Well done, Nick Ferrari 👏 You exposed the hypocrisy and double standards for everyone to see. No wonder people are furious.

[Claire Coutinho @ClaireCoutinho]

South Wales Police has instructed officers to log comments they feel are beyond "legitimate" criticism of Islam.

This is, exactly as I warned, a blasphemy law through the back door.

Nobody voted for this.

My letter to the Chief Constable👇🏾

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

I have a simple question to ask on X.

Why are mainstream journalists and media outlets not examining the public evidence regarding Andy Burnham's role in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs during his tenure as Greater Manchester Mayor?

Serious questions have been raised by whistleblower Maggie Oliver. The public deserves to know why Burnham promoted an Assurance Review in Oldham described as 'nothing short of a cover up'.

Put aside my personal views for a moment. There are two possibilities here. Either Burnham and his so called team of experts set about delivering a sham review and protecting Labour Party politicians, council official and police officers, or concerns raised by a respected whistleblower are also baseless.

Journalists should be examining the facts and timeline in detail so voters can judge for themselves. Not one has. Why? With Burnham set to become Prime Minister, why is the evidence of his role in the Pakistani Rape Gang cover up being ignored?

The evidence is available for scrutiny, yet as the election approaches, there appears to be little media pressure to address this head-on. Just what do you think will happen once he becomes MP?

[Frank Stephens @justrightFrank]

This cop raped a 7 year old girl 3 times a week for 8 years.
He;
Threatened witnesses.
Pestered a 14 year old girl.
Abused another child and turned up drunk for work.
We all know who David Carrick is but no one knows who Mohammed Younis is?
Two Tier MSM?
https://t.co/oU2xLs7qam

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Various death threats received for criticising the rampant sexism within Islam - the police have been informed.

We will not be intimidated.

I said that there is finally a political party willing to stand up for our Christian values, and I meant it.

Restore Britain.

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@RupertLowe10 Immigration and Customs Enforcement is required

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

Outstanding incompetence that Labour aren't even attempting to rectify, shameful

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.

Some extracts from our report…

“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”

“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”

“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”

“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”

“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”

“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”

“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”

“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”

“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”

“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”

“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”

“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”

But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...

It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.

And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.

Funded by us, of course.

How about improving data-linking systems?

The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.

And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?

“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”

The numbers…

£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal

All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.

And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.

Want more?

At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.

Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.

Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?

Us.

And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?

The Home Office isn’t sure.

It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.

Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…

And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?

“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”

The result?

“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”

Astounding incompetence.

But there’s more good news...

The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.

In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.

This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”

“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.

I have a better idea. My own view?

Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.

And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…

And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.

It isn’t. And it never will be.

It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.

A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.

Deport them all.

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@recusant_raja It's simply supporting right over wrong, good over evil, it's nowt to do with politics, skin colour or religion. Keep fighting the good fight Raja

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@Jake_Ventham Restore Britain, fcuk the rest, especially the terrorists

[David Marshall 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sausageandeggx]

They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

These are all common sense!

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@BFCTurf @pnefc Pussy

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@eyespy1234567 @pnefc Who isn't

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

Keir Starmer attacks Elon Musk for “interfering in our politics” and “whipping up division” over the Henry Nowak case.
This is the same man who knelt for George Floyd and sent Labour activists to campaign against Trump in America.
Musk didn’t create division — he amplified the truth about police failures that left an 18-year-old British student to bleed out. Starmer wants to silence scrutiny, not deliver justice.
The British people see through the hypocrisy. Musk exposes what Starmer wants buried.

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@NadineDorries A vote for Restore is a vote for the real alternative. A vote for labour is like refusing life saving treatment. A vote for reform is what you do when there isn't a real alternative

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@PS_is_Back @Benleo

[Dr. Calum Miller @DrCalumMiller]

I am a medical doctor and I can say clearly: this is not good enough.

Henry Nowak was murdered and the police let him die.

When someone tells you they've been stabbed and are struggling to breathe, unless they pose an obvious risk to your own life, you make sure they are OK before you do anything else.

You don't pause to think about whether they might be racist, or whether they could be making it up.

There must be justice for Henry.

[Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio @LeoKearse]

I’m pretty sure that when Henry Nowak’s father said he did not want his son’s death to create more division, he did not mean: “I want left-wing politicians and commentators to weaponise my grief to shut down debate.”

Yet that is exactly what is happening. It’s disgusting to see his words misappropriated as a political battering ram, used to attack anyone who asks difficult questions about the way Henry was treated, and about the anti-white ideology explicitly codified in the public sector.

Mr Nowak also said that the police treatment of his dying son was “inhumane and degrading”.

We should make sure no other British child is treated the way Henry was.

[Tim Crowther @tinytimcrowther]

@oJARDINEo That'll teach them