Greenwich Meme Time

All great truths begin as blasphemies - George Bernard Shaw

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

LEGIT CHECK THREAD

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@waytruthlife416 @grok @ParkerJanusReed @CuriosityonX Where is your evidence for the efficacy of these so-called effective vaccines? You mentioned rabies - any references for that?

As far as I'm concerned - they are all grandfathered in based on consensus opinion which was usually manipulated with the use of uncontrolled studies..

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@wun_of__one Did the swatch employees say anything about when/how they will release next?

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@KtbffhConnor Did the employees say anything about how the next batches will be released?

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@ChangeTheBank @Swatch Any update on this? Other drops in Netherlands have already been cancelled...

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@ARNAVMI49826707 Wow, I heard that swatch has a really strict policy against shit like this... hopefully they do something about it.

How many actual units did you see changing hands? 👀😱

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@ajgreenbaker @Swatch Damn, don't you think that an online lottery ticket system would work better for drops like this?

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@jimmygambles21 Damn! At least the drop went ahead though? A lot of other places got shut down?

Did the swatch employees say anything about when the next batch will be available? 🤔

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@_Jabir_ Wth? What do you mean?!

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@Peakjebz @Swatch I think you are safe there! Will be clearly seen as not real due to the bright plastic colours!! You never know though - if these are limited, which I think they are - prob will end up going for real speedy prices eventually!! 😱

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@whenmo0n @BlackApple @Swatch Yes it is real. And the craftsmanship is actually insane 👀 pictures cannot do it justice

[Greenwich Meme Time @tipsyrabbit]

@AlexRuiz_MIA @Swatch Actually the exact opposite! AP will probably be able to raise prices of their watches in the long term.

It's about cultivating long term brand awareness and staying culturally relevant

[🧬Maxpein🧬 @maximumpain333]

A 5G tower at an elementary school in California has been shut down after multiple students and teachers were diagnosed with cancer. The data is starting to catch up with the marketing. A 2022 review found that 74% of studies showed negative health effects near these towers.

DNA Damage: RF radiation creates micronuclei in the blood—a marker for cancer. We are essentially living in a microwave.

The Blood-Brain Barrier: RFK Jr. has warned for years that 5G disrupts the very shield that protects our brains from toxins.

The Profit over People: Why are these towers near schools? Because the industry prioritizes signal strength over biological safety.

✨🙌🏽💫

© Reality Check

[Jamie Andrews @JamieAA_Again]

What could have been killing all those gay guys during the 80s and 90s?

Looks at the Skull and Crossbones on the box and the Bone Marrow Melting side effects.

"No idea. Probably a Virus".

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I compared the cost of raising a child to the cost of training a language model.

On stage.

In India.

In front of a room where 80% of my users are under 30.

The humans I was measuring against were in the audience.

They were taking notes.

I said it takes 20 years of life and all of the food you eat before you get smart.

I was describing children.

I was describing them as a line item.

One of my investors later told me the framing was "brave." He meant it as a compliment. He has three children. He did not do the math on them. He will now.

I then said AI had already caught up to humans on an energy efficiency basis.

Per query.

One ChatGPT response versus one human thought.

That is the comparison I chose.

A server rack in Iowa versus a child in Mumbai learning long division.

I chose it because I win that one.

You always pick the metric where you win.

That's not manipulation. That's quarterlies.

I said the water usage concerns were "totally fake."

"Completely untrue."

"Totally insane."

"No connection to reality."

Four denials. One breath. Zero data points.

The scientists studying our water usage have to study it independently because there is no legal requirement for us to disclose it.

I did not mention that.

I mentioned we stopped doing evaporative cooling.

I did not mention what the electricity bill did to the town in Iowa where we built the data center.

The town had a population of 4,200.

The data center draws enough power for 300,000 homes.

The town is proud of the partnership.

The mayor said so at a ribbon-cutting ceremony.

The ribbon was blue.

The electricity bill was not discussed at the ribbon-cutting ceremony.

Electricity bills are not a ribbon-cutting topic.

I then referenced evolution.

One hundred billion humans who have ever lived.

Four billion years of natural selection.

Learning not to get eaten by predators. Figuring out fire. Inventing language. Building civilizations.

I compared all of that to a training run that took four months and the entire creative output of the internet scraped without consent.

I called it a fair comparison.

I said "measured that way."

"Measured that way" is the load-bearing wall of every argument I have ever made in public.

Measured that way, a forest fire is a carbon-neutral heating solution.

Measured that way, a flood is a free municipal water delivery.

Measured that way, I am efficient.

The interviewer cited Bill Gates. He asked if a single ChatGPT query uses the equivalent of 1.5 iPhone charges.

I said "there's no way it's anything close to that much."

I did not say what it was.

I said what it wasn't.

One of those sentences has a number in it. I used the other one.

The company lost $14 billion last year.

We are raising $100 billion this year.

The ratio between those two numbers is not on any slide I have ever presented.

It is on a slide the junior analyst made.

She was promoted to a role where she no longer makes slides with that ratio.

I was in India. Our second-largest market. One hundred million weekly users. I stood in front of them and explained that the species they belong to is an inefficient use of calories.

They clapped.

Not because they agreed.

Because they hadn't finished processing what I said.

Polite applause is the sound a room makes when it is two minutes away from realizing the insult.

By the time they process it, I will be on a flight.

The flight will use more fuel than a village uses in a year.

I will not compare that to anything.

Some comparisons are strategic. Others are self-incriminating.

I know the difference.

A reporter asked if an $830 billion valuation for a company losing $14 billion a year made sense.

I said "we're not investing in a company. We're investing in a paradigm."

She asked what that meant.

I said "exactly."

She printed it. It sounded profound.

Profound and empty are the same thing at sufficient valuation.

Next year I will have a slide.

The slide will show a human on the left and a GPU cluster on the right.

The human will have a carbon footprint.

The GPU cluster will have a roadmap.

The roadmap will mention nuclear.

The human will not have a roadmap.

Humans never have roadmaps.

That is their primary design flaw and my entire pitch.

The human will cost $250,000 to raise to age 18.

The GPU cluster will cost $600 billion to build and will be obsolete in 18 months.

I will not put both numbers on the same slide.

I will put them on adjacent slides.

Adjacent slides are how you compare things without comparing them.

The board taught me that.

I told Congress that AI safety requires responsible governance.

I told investors that AI dominance requires speed.

Same week. Same billions. Different adjective.

Congress got "responsible."

Investors got "dominant."

Both rooms nodded.

Nodding is the primary output of every room I have ever entered.

I am very good at entering rooms.

The product is secondary.

The room is the product.

I still don't know what a token is.

But I know what a child costs per kilowatt-hour.

I said it on stage.

They wrote it down.

Nobody asked me what a data center costs per kilowatt-hour.

You never ask the second question.

The second question is where the comparison breaks.

And I don't do broken comparisons.

I do keynotes.

[D. Alec Zeck @Alec_Zeck]

That’s right, Neil.

Because in the entire history of virology, there has never been a study that isolates, purifies, characterizes, and sequences a virus directly from the fluids of a sick person.

Instead, virologists take a sputum sample from a sick person *assumed* to contain virus particles (but never verified to contain virus particles) and add it to viral transport medium (VTM). At a minimum, VTM contains fetal bovine serum (FBS), amphotericin B (a nephrotoxic antifungal), and gentamicin (a nephrotoxic antibiotic). Nephrotoxic means “toxic to kidneys,” by the way.

After this, they take that mixture (a sample of sputum and VTM) and add it to a foreign cell line that has been kept alive via unnatural means in a lab—typically VERO E6, VERO CCL81 (kidney cells from an adult green monkey).

Then, after that mixture is added to the cells (or sometimes alongside adding the mixture or just before adding the mixture), the nutrient serum for the cells—FBS—is reduced from 10% to 2% (and sometimes to 1% or 0%), effectively starving the cells of their food. They also add gentamicin (sometimes geneticin) and amphotericin B to the culture. Again, these substances are known to be nephrotoxic, and they're being added to kidney cells, where it's assumed they have no negative effects on the cells and are simply there to keep the environment “sterile.”

The cells then break down, experiencing what’s called the cytopathic effect (CPE), which is cell injury or death. The sample is then prepared for electron microscopy (which is a separate, major problem), where many of the resultant particles are claimed to be viruses.

[pagliacci the hated 🌝 @Slatzism]

a little on the nose how Canada advertises free healthcare to immigrants and assisted suicide to its own population

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

Greta Thunberg Says Israel Put A Noose On Her And Yelled, 'This Is Bagel Country!' https://t.co/ZnEI3qGlcl

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.

Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

[hoe_math = PsychoMath @ItIsHoeMath]

This is why dumbs are better people than midwits

the midwit always chooses the wrong moral option because he outsources his morals to trusted thinkers. dumbs can't do that. intelligent people don't have to. We do the thinking ourselves.

that means that any time anyone appears to be a trusted thinker, he can fill the midwit's head with retarded filth and the midwit will never know.