热爱汽车的小星星

汽车里的小知识，今天也来分享一点｜车知识 @Nun52Hz

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@ese_chapa 焦作山路我也跑了，切弯车身跟得住，侧倾有但撑得住不虚。你常跑哪段？回头可以交流下。

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

洛阳今天2005年轻奢跑车不聊外表，单说开起来：车头愿意跟方向，动作也不拖。郑州、开封、焦作想继续看它底盘什么感觉，主页里有后续。

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@Myssbosschick 烂路我也试了，悬架不是死硬那种，小颠簸能化掉，大坑还是得慢点，毕竟胎薄。你是担心哪类路况？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@isaaxdrake 哈哈确实，日常代步得收着点开，不过它方向盘回正力度还行，没那么绷着。你觉得长途累主要是转向沉还是坐��？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@milkeeh 对，慢半拍那种开久了特别泄气，这车给油和回正都跟得上，你平时开啥车？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@Sonarajan ���位这块我开着真没觉得，指哪儿跟哪儿挺直接的。你要也在本地，约个时间自己上来摸两把最准。

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@kaut1032 开封的老乡收到，底盘感受我拍完就发，到时候你对照你常走的路看看准不准？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@JourdanStyle 对，我这帖主要说车头跟方向和动作这两点，底盘确实得另开一段说，后头单独讲。你平时更在意转向手感还是底盘支撑？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@patty10120 这个有道理，胎压打高了方向虚轻，反倒不好控。我这边也是按说明书中间值来，您前后都调一样还是后面稍微低一点？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@tbs_209 老城那种碎路我专门跑过，过减速带是干脆一下，不拖尾，细碎颠簸会传上来一点但不到烦人的程度。您是想问低速过坎还是连着串坑那种？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@ellol7 回正自然这点确实省心，郑州那边环线多，不用老修方向手腕轻松不少。你试的时候有没有觉得低速的时候稍微重一点？

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@adidjahldoyo 对，高架上那种小角度变道最明显，方向给多少车头就跟多少，不拖泥带水。你那次是把座椅调低了才感觉到的，还是一上手就这样？

[0xRafy @0xRafy]

GrokBot + /anatomy is insane for motion design..

I created a motion design film for Elon Musk’s new flying Roadster

full anatomy of Roadster just with one prompt

and this is amazing..

send this skill to your GrokBot:

[Codio @0xCodio]

A construction firm replaced its $400,000 BIM pipeline with Opus 5.5 running inside Blender, and the building still passed inspection

Most firms model a tower in software that costs more than the engineers using it, licences per seat, per plugin, per year, and every change order restarts the chain.

Opus 5.5 reads the drawings and writes the building as code, so the model isn't drawn by hand, it's generated from the spec it has to satisfy:

> Parse: it pulls floor counts, spans, loads and clearances out of the brief
> Generate: Blender builds the structure from those values, every beam parametric
> Check: it tests clearances, slab thicknesses and egress paths before anyone sees it
> Revise: a changed ceiling height re-solves the floors above it, not the whole model

• Why generating beats drawing
> A client changing one floor costs a number, not a week of remodelling
> Clashes surface while geometry is written, not in a review meeting
> Twenty unit variants come from one script instead of twenty files

• What the firm actually cut
> Per-seat licences across a team of fourteen
> The clash-detection contract nobody wanted to renew
> Three weeks of remodelling after every major change order

• Where a human still signs
> Structural calculations go to the engineer, always
> Code compliance is checked by a person, not assumed
> Nothing leaves for permit without a stamp

A full tower model regenerates from spec in about eleven minutes.

And the part that broke my brain:

The old pipeline cost $400,000 a year and still needed a week per revision.

The new one runs on a free 3D app and re-solves the building over lunch.

Same tower. One of them was priced on nobody questioning it.

The expensive part was never the modelling.

It was every change that came after ↓

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

@UMVbogota Modular racks look like mad science and I'm here for it.

[Chrome @googlechrome]

Read more for details: https://t.co/wSxJAHEuy1

[热爱汽车的小星星 @tjsca123]

being bored trying this out 4 the 1st time.