This is called "after-acquired probable cause" and is Constitutionally impermissible. Beck v. Ohio is your case.
An officer stops a car because he has a gut feeling the driver has drugs in the car, but no articulable facts amounting to PC. During the stop, he runs the plate and learns the car is stolen. Objectively, that fact would have provided probable cause if known at the time. But because it was discovered only afterwards, it cannot be used to justify the action. The officer got lucky, but the law does not let the government use information the officer did not possess at the time he acted.
Stated another way: An arrest or search cannot be justified by what it turns up, and the government cannot backfill Constitutional justification for a rights violation based on blind luck.
However, even if this information was known beforehand, use of force still has to comport with Graham v. Connor. This would be a non-violent regulatory offense and unlikely, *by itself*, to justify deadly force.
Nuclear power already plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions, and therefore must be part of the clean energy mix. To meet the growing demand for sustainable energy, we will need nuclear energy to provide 25% of electricity before 2050. #earthday#globalwarming
Sad part is the parents think they are in the right. Telling the ump to “do his job”. Their only job is to cheer and support their kids, not to speak to him. This is so upsetting.
We all love a two-day school closing, but a 70-degree shift from -20º days to a 50º day within 48 hours is not normal. Major flooding in Ann Arbor is not normal. A 71% decrease in ice coverage on the Great Lakes is not normal. The climate is changing right here, right now.