TeeMaa

Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make a man a more clever devil - C.S. Lewis Brazen Hussy

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@JohnBerman @CNN I appreciate your journalism overall but I think it is time you replaced @MaxFosterCNN as he is a terrible journalist. He is no better than the gutter-dwelling tabloid journalists like Russel Myers whose comment he used in his royal family comeback against the

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@PeacefulUntree Might be what the first wife wore. I wouldn’t want to wear it either as no. 2.

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@SussexHenryVIII Money from taxpayers is certainly going to the upkeep of that home - one way or the other, it’s coming from the monarch.

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@SussexHenryVIII His mother loved him enough to provide for him even if ostentatiously. Not all people who have children are parents

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@jannycat @thebluestshade You’re a crazy bigoted lady who sits on here daily being miserable cause a Prince did not & no man in their right man would chose you. If you’re in a relationship, you’re miserable. You probably also have economic anxiety & are all around awful, otherwise this won’t be your life

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@jannycat @thebluestshade You’re a liar. I never followed when news of her & Harry dating broke. You know where I picked everything up? Paper review on Sky News in the morning as I dressed to go into work. Then I thought- did she eat a day old baby? That was only reason I could see for the daily vitriol

[Byline Times @BylineTimes]

📌 ICYMI — Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s Daughters Are Still Receiving Rent-Free Royal Accommodation — David Hencke

Beatrice and Eugenie continue to be……

https://t.co/w0gTrT7meW

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@jannycat @thebluestshade We know you are a racist because your TL is filled with hatred of Meghan. On what basis did your hate form? You met her? What is the genesis of your hate?

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@EJWoolf You are a misogynist so why are you complaining? Oh, she’s qwhite so deserves to be treated better?

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@StephanieRade18 @maddenifico That was clear from the first time around but some Americans want to burn it to the ground. Goodluck y’all.

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@BBCNews I hope there was no police security operation at that wedding, otherwise, can we have an accounting and proof that CharlieTampon paid for the security?

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@Shannon79053723 Some heifer on here saying royal family & British media lost their minds because Harry was single and Meghan was divorced. This woman was hated at the time because her father was a Nazi - I think there was more emphasis of her Nazi adjacency than her prior marriage

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@blakjaxx I love the disrespectfulness of it all

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@jannycat @thebluestshade Simpson married in 1937 when things like that or being divorced were largely frowned upon. Subsequently, since then, Princess Anne was divorced and remarried, the King & his sideho both got divorced and remarried. So why was there such a hoopla about the biracial woman in 2018?

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@Pond11892Girl @thebluestshade

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@Telegraph

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@Chakopups @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel You people need to stop being delusional. The pictures I have seen looks like a bunch of wet rats running around and nothing about this wedding gives glamour. Pale, stale, mediocre, unattractive and un-inspired is what the pictures show. This is not the event you think it is.

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@inev_y2015 @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel Women can wear whatever they want. Before Queen Victoria wearing white, it was not the bridal color. There is nothing that day “virginal” about white so please let people breathe!

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@ZZeekhumalo @C_J_PhD @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel You should have clocked that one is tweeting from an asylum. No way she has an iota of real education

[TeeMaa @tma285]

@AstraAd75635 @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel Is it a “royal” wedding? On what basis is Peter a “royal”? Is he a “working royal”? If only “working royals” are “royals”, then this the a pleb wedding and not a “royal” wedding. Peter and Harry are both “non-working” royals, ergo, not “royal”?