US Congressman loses it over India regulating foreign funds
Riley Moore has criticized India’s Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) changes, framing them as a “clear attack against Christians” and threatening India with consequences.
Basically, FCRA aims to limit foreign influence and propaganda money coming into India.
The hypocrisy here is that the US has its own version of this — the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Similarly, it forces disclosure and control of foreign money and influence.
The US calls it national security. Yet, when India does the same, they call it “religious persecution.“
So what is Rep. Moore really more concerned about — protecting Christianity, or India fighting foreign influence?
ट्रेन में कोई कोना नहीं होता। मुसलमान आने-जाने के रास्ते केपी ब्लॉक करते हैं, ट्रेन में भी, सड़कों पर भी। कांवड़ियों की सारी सीट है, हिंदू बैठे हैं, बोल-बम का नारा लगा रहे हैं, तुम्हें क्यों पेट में दर्द हो रहा है? तुम्हारे मस्जिद में या मक्का की फ्लाइट में तो बोल-बम नहीं बजा दिया ना? हिंदू अपने देश में ट्रेन में नाचे नहीं कह कि कोई मुल्ला नाराज़ हो जाएगा! कहाँ है यहाँ कोई मुल्ला?
Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg apologises for child sexual abuse material and deepfake content; admits money was paid for "boosting a certain type of content".
In 2020, Meta appointed Muslim Brotherhood figure Tawakkul Karman to its Facebook Oversight Board.
https://t.co/le4iweNlnp
Oh dear! A full press conference on me? Now show us the 1) the rent agreement of Saurav Das for the house he said he wasn’t staying in 2) his income documents 3) the loan documents and financials of Dipke. I’m not stopping.
Meta* did the unpardonable by removing PM Modi's video: Indian official
"You cannot just take down a post which has been put up by the executive head of the Government of India," Senior Advisor, I&B Ministry, Kanchan Gupta, told Sputnik India.
"That by itself becomes a symbol of interference in the political process of this country."
This could be the most SHOCKING thread of the year.
Read this thread, and you will understand why CJP and other professional protesters have so much support from Western countries and what the role of FCRA is.
Meet US citizen Dinesh Thakur, who funds CJP spokesperson Saurav Das
Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has approached Bombay High Court against-social media posts linking him, and his family to E20 related business gains.
According to Nitin Gadkari's lawsuit in Bombay HC, the disputed content on social media include posts and deepfake pictures and videos etc linking him and his family to profits from the E20 ethanol blending programme. Lawsuit filed by him also emphasises that the ethanol blending policy is being administered by the Petroleum Ministry.
HC has allowed him to file a civil suit against Meta and other social media platforms and unidentified entities which are allegedly being used for spreading misinformation against Nitin Gadkari and his family.
(File photo)
Muslims who go pray right in the middle of a Western beach, among scantily clad people, is no innocent exercise of religion. It is pure provocation and an act of cultural dominance.
In their own doctrine, a beach full of exposed bodies is zina – forbidden, sinful, and impure. Yet they deliberately choose precisely that spot to perform their prayers, with their behinds in the air facing Mecca, while forcing the entire surroundings to respect their ritual.
They consciously ignore the local norms, the nudity that they would strictly forbid or punish in their own countries, and then claim the public space as their religious territory.
- @P0eMPieDinges
There was a time when the govt would seal all Delhi borders (this time, SP goons had a free run) to avoid such situations.
Now, with the present day technology and surveillance capability, if the govt doesn't know or doesn't react to such sponsorship, nothing can be said!
In counter terrorism operations, more than firing bullets, we focus on breaking such supply chains and then only viable results are achieved.
@AmitShah
On so-called ‘CJP’ protest-related violent anarchy Arnab Goswami @republic raises some valid questions after red flagging Advisory issued by US Embassy in Delhi:
How did the US Embassy map out specific details for the central Delhi protests days in advance?
Exact locations like Kisan Ghat and Jantar Mantar, and movements of farmer groups, all tracked before it even happened?
Is this a Deep State operation driven by foreign funding to create chaos just as Parliament addresses strict FCRA regulations?
Mesopotamia was never the cradle of civilisation. India was.
I spent forty years in international shipping, not academia. When I began researching the history of maritime trade, I had no orthodoxy to defend. I followed the evidence, and it kept arriving in the same place: the Indian subcontinent.
Nineteenth century archaeologists dug in Mesopotamia because the climate preserved artefacts, the biblical sources pointed them there, and the Ottomans allowed the excavations. That is the entire basis for the myth of Mesopotamia as "the cradle of civilisation."
Nobody applied the same rigour to India. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. By then the narrative had already hardened.
What was actually there was the largest civilisation of the ancient world. Three hundred cities. Fifty thousand people in each, by 2600 BC. Two thirds of them stood on the banks of the Sarasvati, the central and greatest of the seven rivers described in the Rig Veda, flowing down from the Himalayas before the river vanished entirely by 1900 BC. The Vedic kings claimed territory stretching "sea to sea," from Afghanistan to Maharashtra, some 1.5 million square miles, against Egypt's 13,000. A dock at Lothal built to handle thirty ships of sixty tons, unmatched in Europe for four thousand years. When it was first excavated, it was recorded as a bathing pool.
When the scale became impossible to dismiss, the theory was not corrected. It was replaced with a story of pale-skinned nomads from the steppe who supposedly arrived around 1500 BC and brought civilisation with them. There is no evidence. The chronology doesn't work. The Vedas describe no invasion.
In 2019 a Harvard-led genetic study revived the claim, and the press reported it as confirmation. It was not. The same study found the builders of these cities were indigenous. The Sarasvati river that the Rig Veda described had already dried up before these newcomers arrived. What the study also found is that a small group of men, arriving after the Sarasvati had already dried up, interbred with the existing population and left a genetic signature. That is all.
So, where they chose to dig was mostly an accident of climate and access. The Aryan invasion theory was constructed because an Indian civilisation that owed nothing to Caucasians was a fact the late nineteenth century could not accommodate.
Link to full Substack essay with sources in the comments below.