toasterhead

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@unclebobmartin "You can disagree with someone, and still respect them. You can hate and abhor their actions, but you still need to treat them with respect. And either we are all humans that are equal, and deserve to be treated as equals, or we're not." - Mark Edward Fischbach (aka Markiplier)

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@Vironcy Half Life 3

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@unclebobmartin One day we'll give up those abstract meaningless words we came up with and face the reality that there's no such thing. We're all some form or machines

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

AI bubble going to crush so hard. But not because of what people think. One bug, one blind AI mistake, is all it takes in the modern software-dependant world for a business to go bankrupt, for vital systems to crush, for thousands to die. Then governments would step in. Tick-tock

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@GohilHardy Because most code are written by people who had never maintained software before. Most GitHub open source project's code is a tangled mess XD

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@samongaro_ Making the code maintainable (clean architecture) even for itself when the requirements change, or testing the system before claiming it works, and not understanding the consequences of code on performance, and missing vulnerabilities (because it was trained on bad code) etc etc

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@marcinbunsch AI's don't think like humans do, so what's easily understandable to it might not to a human. You are still the architect, you're the reviewer, and the AI can only follow

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@Motivational__G 697

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@CodeWithTamara Now you got to do it 10 times more with AI bugs!

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@danellisona Software Engineering was always about building software. AI won't build it all by itself, the customer can't be bothered dealing with it, the corporate people can't be bothered and won't take responsibility for AI's bugs and failures, so you tell me who's left?

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@ArshiQu3311 Bro is turning himself into Robbie Rotten

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@mark_k If so, then why when a programmer tells the AI it did something wrong the AI responds with: "You're right!"

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@rgrzywinski @unclebobmartin @janetacarr Are self-driving cars tools or a being then? They get you from point A to point B, they don't exist for any other purpose, thus a tool. Your human co-worker has a life and survival needs, this not a tool. Why are we even arguing about this

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@nerder_ @unclebobmartin @janetacarr The one who pulls the trigger

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@janetacarr Tools are built by human for the purpose of doing something better than a human. Cars didn't replace humans because they run faster, they replaced only our job description from a horseman to a driver

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@brinkzapp Ask the AI to make it prettier and more informative. Maybe add animations and polish to make it fun 😝

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@unclebobmartin Unless you'd use open source models, then maybe swarm would be the way to go

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@unclebobmartin Maybe make your own to combat the others. Big brain

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@rajgupta7813589 That's what Stack Overflow was for before you overflew it by AI

[toasterhead @toasterhead12]

@Immy_220 31 the killer (could be you) and the bodies, everyone else ran