๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ Happily married to @mrstobycovfefe
I believe in one God,
the Father Almighty,
Maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
God from God,
Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
consubstantial with the Father;
through Him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
He came down from heaven,
and by the Holy Spirit
was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake He was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
He suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead,
and His kingdom will have no end.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the Lord, the Giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
I believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.
I confess one Baptism
for the forgiveness of sins,
and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the world to come.
Amen. ๐๐ผ
@WhiteHouse Play LOUD.
Be PROUD!
https://t.co/Xh40Y3wA9D
FIGHT for what is RIGHT!
FIGHT for FREEDOM!
They will not win.
Divide they try.
Fail they will.
TOGETHER.
WWG1WGA!
Q+
Since Linsey Graham is in the news, perhaps it's a good time to revisit his questioning of Brett Kavanaugh during his SCOTUS confirmation hearing in 2018.
What I have always found super interesting about this line of questioning is why Graham would even 'go there'? This is in no way/shape/form a standard-type inquiry. It's completely out of left field.
IMHO, it's almost as though the moment was being used to signal that something else was afoot. Something not only germane to that particular moment in time, but remains so to this very day.
The questioning centers on Kavanaugh confirming that there are two bodies of law.
1) Criminal Law
2) Law of Armed Conflict
The point being made is that if you're an American citizen who collaborated with an enemy, you can be treated as an enemy combatant and therefore tried by the military.
And in this case, according to the SCOTUS decision referenced (Johnson v. Eisentrager), a citizen loses certain Constitutional rights that would otherwise allow them to be tried in the criminal justice system.
"Johnson v. Eisentrager was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that nonresident enemy aliens captured and held outside the United States do not have the constitutional right to seek a writ of habeas corpus in U.S. civilian courts."
Why do you think Graham set out to bring this to the public's attention?
WHITE HOUSE IS STRAIGHT UP Q POSTING AGAIN ๐ฅ
They tried to say it was just โQuantumโโฆ but we know the plan.
Where We Go One, We Go Quantum.
Trump dropping EOโs, America leading the future, and the storm is here. Patriots winning.
WWG1WGA ๐๐บ๐ธ #Q#Quantum#ThePlanโ
MThe 9-5 is quietly dying and most people are still pretending itโs not.
Remote work + AI tools let anyone with discipline build a better life on their terms.
But comfort feels safer than freedom.
Whoโs actually escaping the matrix in 2026? Drop your story ๐
#AI#RemoteWork
The most successful people aren't the smartest or hardest working.
They're the ones who mastered saying "No" to 99% of opportunities so they can obsess over the 1% that actually moves the needle.
Change my mind.
What's the best "No" you've ever said? Drop it below ๐
The White House dropping "Q" references again...
First the Quantum Executive Order, now the timing and wording.
Coincidence? Or are we watching the plan unfold in real time?
The Great Awakening isn't a theory anymore โ it's happening.
What do you see? ๐
WWG1WGA
Everyone asks, โIs Q military intelligence?โ
I now think thatโs the wrong question.
Instead of asking AI for a verdict, I built a six-stage reasoning architecture that separates evidence, ontology, assumptions, reconstruction, and recursive consistency. Both Grok and ChatGPT independently converged on the same conclusion.
The result surprised me. The biggest contribution isnโt the answerโitโs a new way to analyse contested historical realities.
Who is Q? became Why Q?
https://t.co/TghOv0TY2z