Tricking women to go work a job so they can pay someone else to raise their kids is one of the greatest scams in the history of America.
This is now how the family unit was intended to operate.
How do I know the media is brainwashing people?
Obama's ICE Chief received the Presidential Award for Distinguished Service for removing over 900,000 illegal aliens.
Trump's ICE Chief is called a Nazi.
It is the same person.....Tom Homan....
The only difference? The narrative.
Hey @ClareONeilMP - Read the comments to your post.
All 2,400 of them. Read every single one.
Maybe then you’ll finally educate yourself.
Australians are absolutely fed up with your dangerous incompetence and thoroughly sick of your endless gaslighting and spin.
You were a catastrophic failure as Home Affairs Minister, flooding the country with an unprecedented wave of migrants that helped trigger the housing crisis.
As Housing Minister, every meddling intervention you’ve come up has made the disaster worse.
You don’t solve problems — you create them.
And now you want Death Taxes.
Aussies: “We need to minimise immigration.”
Gov: “No, we aren’t doing that.”
Aussies: “Rent is too expensive.”
Gov: “Good point. We’ll increase costs for landlords so they have to charge you more.”
Aussies..."Electricity is too expensive"
Gov..."We're committed to net zero...regardless of the cost to you!"
Aussies: “I can’t keep up with the cost of living.”
Gov: “Too bad. We can’t stop spending more than we’re making, so inflation will keep rising.”
Aussies: “The NDIS is scamming taxpayers out of millions every year.”
Gov: “Yeah, but we don’t want to offend the NDIS scammers — they might call us racist.”
Aussies: “Okay fine, we gave you a chance. We’re voting @OneNationAus.”
Gov: “You filthy, uneducated racist.”
Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "Where did they get it?"
Activist: "What?"
Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere."
Activist: "From... eating?"
Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it."
Activist: "The soil?"
Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from."
Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it."
Activist: "Then just don't have the cow."
Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle."
Activist: "It's not that simple."
Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
500k followers giveaway pt 1!
My golf bag plus some @Titleist goodies
Comment, like, repost to enter. Must be a follower
Clubs not included unfortunately*
Still need those for my day job