@grahamhturner@coreyaxelrod@kevinlerickson @stenoknight I suspect that a potentially great discussion is limited by platform, sadly. I would like to better understand your perspective though. Thank you for the link.
@grahamhturner@coreyaxelrod@kevinlerickson @stenoknight As an interpreter I understand that occasionally we run up against things that are uninterpretable (no equivalent concept in the other language). But maintaining meaning is at the heart of what we should be doing.
@coreyaxelrod@semaj187 Another issue that I see is that terps assume linguistic competence in any and every setting. With 150+ diff kinds of docs, docs themselves admit that they don’t understand it all. How possible for Terps to do what docs can’t?
@coreyaxelrod@semaj187 Multiple fallacies going in here... that there is *one sign* for technical medical words; that an interpreter having a medical creeemtial will mean that they will understand and be able to talk about it in either English or ASL
Noticing a change in the signed language interpreter field, which makes me wonder: How are people currently defining/using the terms ���designated interpreters” or “designated interpreting”?