@mattbarcomb Yes. Even if they don’t have their own specific data there is always some reference data that can help. I find industry reference data quite useful for making sure the confidence interval is realistic. As you saw from HTMA people are hugely overconfident.
@mattbarcomb Totally agree, although would add that all decisions are made under uncertainty and that many organizations and individuals are very poor at understanding the reality of the inherent uncertainty.
@mattbarcomb If you have highs and lows you have ranges. If you have more than one time on a new instance you have multiple ranges which can give a range of ranges.
@allenholub If story points are done right (as originally suggested in XP) it is possible to do math on the numbers and not commit any mathematical fallacies. However, that does not mean that the results are meaningful.
@duarte_vasco I see this all the time. "We have to do this project because it aligns with our strategy." Aligning with a strategy is a bucket. Lots of things align with a strategy, but that doesn't make it "strategic." Make sure you use your strategy as a filter, not a bucket.
I once heard this from @toddelittle in this form: "strategy is a filter. Problem is, most people think it is a bucket" (where everything fits until it overflows)
Watch this video to learn how, with Joey Spooner @spoonstein and Todd Little @toddelittle of Kanban University.
📺 Add this to your must watch list:
https://t.co/295SPhx8us
📅 Join us at our next DC Lean+Agile Meetup!
https://t.co/clqDpBT9fO
#scrum#kanban#agilelearning