@IGoBySteve@wanderingdave The planners have not shown why this specific plan is required to achieve affordable housing. We could go other routes, but elect not to. We're simply prioritizing the desires of people who want a small townhome over the desires of SFH owners, which is different than 'need.'
@IGoBySteve@wanderingdave I agree with the goal, but 'necessary' is a dramatic overstatement. Fast tracking large multifamily developments and reducing current restrictions in existing MFH zones would achieve this goal much faster.
@EskicDejan@wanderingdave How does make any sense? If my neighbor was allowed to build 1 inch from my property line, I can't be upset because they had the option not to? I also couldn't be upset if heroin was legalized because it's only another option, not mandatory?
@wanderingdave So because previous changes didn't have a large impact, you can assume this won't change much either? Normally you're more thoughtful than this.