@NeerajKA@tayvano_ I swear to god every bad actor tries to blur the lines to make funds when it's clearly black and white. I hope you enjoy being funded by clear criminals because nobody can be this retarded w/o being a paid actor
Recent events are a reminder that trust in digital assets depends on security, accountability, and the rule of law across the ecosystem.
Circle is a regulated company that complies with sanctions, law enforcement orders, and court-mandated requirements. We freeze assets when legally required, with strong protections for user rights and privacy.
More here: https://t.co/9jqRdYDIzr
before the "timelocks reeeee" commenters find this, a misused timelock can fuck you just as bad. some operations need quick response and low coordination. there's no silver bullet. you actually have to do risk analysis and implement the appropriate things
a list of all accounts with a @TroveMarkets badge
highly recommend to never take any advice from those (best thing to just mute/block)
some of them are "known" for posting screenshots of high win PNLs
yet they sold themselves for $5k/month to rock a testnet badge
@AndrewSeb555@mst1287 It'd be nice if @metanallok and @metaproph3t thought this way but i dont think they care about the NAV > MC at all. THey want to give all startups a chance even if that means bankrupting their holders imo. Could be wrong though.
@barrett_io@metaproph3t@Richard_ISC@ImperialAttila@mst1287@ranger_finance I'm just wondering what this means for the unruggable portion of the dao. I doubt this would succeed and I don't expect anyone to ever propose it, but it would be great if it was clear what token holders can do or can't do