@Pady_oFurniture@beckymontacute@CityWestminster Or find 'first mile' (or whatever the term is ) solutions that allow you to do your job without completely compromising the area's public realm?
@Pady_oFurniture@beckymontacute@CityWestminster I guess the question comes down to:
Should the logistics issues of courier companies based miles away from an area determine how that area's public realm is occupied?
If yes, stick with the status quo.
If no, then opportunities arise that might add real value to the area.
@Pady_oFurniture@beckymontacute@CityWestminster I'm pretty sure that many customers would vote for a better quality of life.
You have the option to change your offer.
What shouldn't happen is second rate areas of cities being preserved for the interests of a minority.
@Feargal_Sharkey Brass neck, but in their odious mindset probably worth Fergal's opprobrium.
Think of the returns for both shareholders directors if they can get away with it.
The directors should be locked up and the companies compulsorily purchased at huge loss to Share holders.
@Pady_oFurniture@beckymontacute@CityWestminster I respect you, your work and this conversation.
This really is a genuine question and not meant to be rude:
So public spaces have to stay exactly as they are, no matter the consequences, because the status quo cannot change?