Jonathan Tonglet

🇧🇪 ELLIS PhD student @ TU Darmstadt and KU Leuven. Multimodal learning and Fact-checking.

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@rikvannoord Thank you for the pointer

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

The Last Translation Benchmark is out. Check it out!

Congrats to @zouharvi and the organizing team for coordinating this huge project.

I am very happy to have contributed instances representative of Flemish and Belgian French.

[Vilém Zouhar @zouharvi]

Machine translation is not solved and it will take a while for it to be done https://t.co/NRecZdw4RU

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@hllo_wrld @askerlee Afaik it does not expire. I have not seen this written anywhere.

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@hllo_wrld @askerlee If you want, I think it is also allowed to commit directly to another conference (eacl, naacl, ...)with the same reviews. Another arr round is optional

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@perdactor @danish037 That would however make the acceptance rate completely uncomparable to non-ARR venues.

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@danish037 @perdactor Are the ARR March cycle papers taken into account? These went all to AACL or EMNLP.

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@Ofirlin Agreed that it deserves Q1. Could it be because it is a relatively young journal? Next evaluation it might move from Q2 to Q1

[Ofir Lindenbaum @Ofirlin]

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (#TMLR) is a great journal.

It offers quick responses and, in my view, the best review process: scoreless reviews → rebuttal and paper revision → scores → decision.

I’m really disappointed by its new Q2 ranking.

I wonder whether something is missing from the metric?

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@thegautamkamath Potential negative side effect: papers get judged based on the affiliations of their authors. This could be detrimental to newcomers and lesser known institutions

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

I made a mistake when claiming that there were 0 reviews. I usually submit my reviews first, so I forgot that other reviews are visible only after I submit my own. This paper had 2 reviews. Nevertheless, that is very sad given that the end of the rebuttal period is approaching.

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

It is wild that some papers have still received 0 reviews for #EMNLP2026. The rebuttal period is supposed to end soon... I wonder how many authors do not fulfill their reviewing duties this cycle

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@josephimperial_ Yeah :( I just started an emergency review of a paper with 0 reviews

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

Will there be sanctions for irresponsible reviewers who did not fulfill their assignments?

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

NAACL rebuttals during christmas... 🥲

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

Now close to 30 requests. I did my best to finish 2 emergency reviews, but I cannot do more. My excuses to all the ACs that I could not help.
If you are eligible and have time to review a paper, please volunteer here to help our ACs: https://t.co/tbb46TbWQe

[ACLRollingReview @ReviewAcl]

🚨 ARR is recruiting extra emergency reviewers and emergency Area Chairs (ACs) for this cycle.

Emergency Reviewer Registration:
https://t.co/DtVZqCHm1o

Emergency AC Registration:
https://t.co/jKxtqzvYbX

Thank you for helping support the ARR review process.
#ARR #ACL #NLProc

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

I received 20 emergency reviewing requests for this ARR May cycle. This is madness. The reviewing system can't keep up with that amount of submissions.

#EMNLP

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@Harshitaskh31 I am a reviewer, not an area chair, so I cannot assign reviews to you. You can volunteer as an emergency reviewer here: https://t.co/tbb46TbWQe

Thank you for your help!

[ACLRollingReview @ReviewAcl]

🚨 ARR is recruiting extra emergency reviewers and emergency Area Chairs (ACs) for this cycle.

Emergency Reviewer Registration:
https://t.co/DtVZqCHm1o

Emergency AC Registration:
https://t.co/jKxtqzvYbX

Thank you for helping support the ARR review process.
#ARR #ACL #NLProc

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@mar_kar_ I wonder what the average scores and acceptance rate will be for these papers without eligible author.
These statistics should be reported to inform future decisions

[Jonathan Tonglet @TongletJ]

@emnlpmeeting > "any concurrently submitted papers on a related topic with an overlapping set of authors must cite each other"

"related topic" is very vague. Can this criteria be clarified? Are for example two papers sharing the same domain (e.g., legal) considered as "related topic"?