@TeesValleyVoice@VeryBrexitProbs@jamespostans1 Can you read? US spends $997b on its own military, not on NATO. And without the $36b spent in Europe, the US wouldn't be able to project its power around the world. They do it for their own benefit, not ours.
@DannyCopus@Dominic_Zaca@Scaramucci There's a difference between wanting to negotiate favourable trade agreements, and actually respecting the current US government.
@m8rbnsn@ThreshedThought EU members or not, is irrelevant. Estonia, France, UK all NATO. An attack on Estonian soil, on any troops based there is an attack on NATO. I understand the point about the death of article 5. I'm just saying the fact British, or indeed French troops being based there or not...
@ThreshedThought Surely, it is irrelevant whether or not the British troops in Estonia would get involved. Estonia is a NATO member, so with or or without British troops based there, any attack invokes article 5. This is either answered by the US or not.
@EricMcQ@Morgan_C_Ross Why do Americans always get this phrase wrong? It should be "couldn't care less"
The fact you could care less, means you currently care somewhat and therefore could care less.