@BoyGeorge I think her constituents who voted for her gave her a political voice. Couldn’t you have read a book on how democracy works when you were in prison you dumb cunt?
Our yearlong investigation reveals Nigel Farage courting illicit funding as part of a plot to bring foreign money into British politics, orchestrated by his top aides and caught on hidden camera.
Listen here, you grifting shithouse.
If you're going to spend every day of your life targeting migrants and the left, at least have the balls to apply the same standards to your mates.
The difference between you and Narinder is that you've been seen rubbing shoulders with men who have been charged with, or convicted of, physical and sexual abuse of women, yet you remain silent.
When Ben Cullen was charged with making indecent images of children, you deleted your content relating to him, Ryan Bridge and Raise the Colours, and you've still said nothing about them to this day.
And now, when there's another story involving people you know, you've gone strangely quiet again?
You pick and choose your outrage when it suits your grift, and it just proves that you don't actually give a shit about women and children!
In the UK 91% of rapists are known by the victim. Adam doesn’t care about 91% of rape victims because he only cares if the perpetrator is non-white and the rape can be used to stir up racial hatred and outrage, and add to his X earnings.
Adam has defended Andrew Tate’s conduct, after he was charged with multiple offences, including against children. Andrew Tate openly advocates for violence against women, beyond the 59 criminal charges against him in the UK. Adam has never said a word against him.
Adam has openly praised Donald Trump over the years, despite the abhorrent way Trump talks about and treats women, along with the fact a jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse.
So, in summary, Adam Brooks doesn’t care about women at all, he just uses them when a convenient opportunity arises for him to stir up racism and xenophobia.
VILE AGENDA
@Nigel_Farage You’re finished
You conceded a third of the vote share to a bin, lied about threats to candidates, and you’re still getting suspended for financial shithousery
You’re done… and I just hope this ends in prison for you and your establishment jackdaws
Greedy self serving cunt
This is why everyone needs critical thinking skills.
The tweet is a classic weather-vs-climate sleight of hand. Facts get it half right and the logic is doing all the misleading work.
The 1911 heatwave was real. It ran from mid-July to mid-September, peaked at 36.7°C at Raunds, Northamptonshire and Canterbury, Kent on 9 August 1911, and it was a severe drought year with genuine hardship (mill closures, water rationing, rising deaths).
Where the ill-informed idiot's argument falls apart:
1. One hot summer isn't "climate."
Climate is the statistical pattern over decades; weather is a single event. 1911 was a freak outlier for its era — its record stood for 79 years before being broken in 1990. That's the point: extreme heat used to be rare enough to hold a record for eight decades.
2. Now those records fall constantly.
Since 1990, the 36.7°C mark has been met or exceeded four times, with two further highest-temperature records set since — 36.7°C again in July 2015, then 38.7°C in Cambridge in July 2019, then 37.8°C in 2020, and the current all-time UK record is now 40.3°C (Coningsby, July 2022).
That acceleration in frequency is the actual climate signal — a single 1911 anecdote can't touch it.
3. The "what caused it, was it aeroplanes/AC/diesel?" line is a straw man fallacy.
Nobody claims 1911 was human-caused warming, and its existence doesn't disprove that the current run of consecutive record-breaking summers is.
While natural heatwaves have always happened, the question is why they're now more frequent and more extreme, not whether one occurred before industrial-era emissions took off.
It's the same rhetorical trick every time: cherry-pick one historical anomaly, use it to imply "see, nothing's changed," and skip past the actual evidence (frequency, trend lines, global temperature records) that the argument would need to engage with.
Patgetuc ill-informed attention-seeking wankers like Brooks are ruining Britain with their banal misleading adolescent bullshit.
The painting over of that cartoon mural in the kids’ asylum centre should have ended Robert Jenrick’s career. It didn’t.
Jenrick’s rise tells us something bleak both about him and the state of British politics: that a key recipe for self-advancement is the pursuit of cruelty.
It's rare that James O'Brien and Nigel Farage are in the same room.
So when the Reform UK leader was leaving the LBC studios after his phone-in with Nick Ferrari, @mrjamesob delivered a one-of-a-kind handover.
The other rule is that this cretin has never understood the difference between climate and weather, and never will. She thinks she is smarter than scientists, the insurance industry, NASA, and the millions of people who are able to read and process evidence and facts. A moron.
Keir Starmer as PM so far:
- Scrapped Rwanda plan
- actioned sewage problem in UK rivers & lakes
- Increased public sector pay
- dealt with far right riots
Had my doubts, but he’s been an excellent pm so far & a massive improvement on Sunak!