The Rings of Power is not what Tolkien wrote. At all.
So, I create the The Rings of Power Changes page with dozens of changes compared (and growing), analyzed and ranked (with references). So no one has any excuse for not proving that there is almost NOTHING in The Rings of Power that is faithful to Tolkien.
Then I visualized it (link in comments) to make it REALLY obvious.
Would love some feedback--let me know if there's anything I missed, or should be changed!
@Gwathron The biggest improvement is actually Sauron. I think Charlie Vickers is doing a pretty good job portraying him. The whole detour into Halbrand seems just so silly and unnecessary.
"I linked [Bilbo's Ring] with the (originally) casual reference to the Necromancer, whose function was hardly more than to provide a reason for Gandalf going away & leaving Bilbo & Dwarves to fend for themselves, which was necessary for the tale." ~ . Tolkien, July 1964
Had this exact discussion on the latest episode of the podcast. There's a difference between a Tolkien fan who knows and appreciates Tolkien, and a "fan" who just revels in middle-school level fan fiction because they saw the movies.
We couldn't figure out the right terminology for the differenc though.
Andy Serkis says that returning to Gollum 26 years after he first played him has him waking up at night wondering whether he is directing Gollum or Gollum is directing him.
What would keep me up at night is why this movie is being made--I still don't understand the idea that we want more of Gollum, when we know the whole story and have seen the beginning and end. ๐คท