TradeForImpact.com

Fully Automated #Crypto Trading System | Over 450 Active Investors | Subscription & Profit Sharing | @zignaly App Top Trader | ✍️ #Bitcoin Investing & Trading

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

Wondering how you can know that it is worth trusting us?

☑️Our Services are available for ALL from 2020, and we have only 5 Stars ratings on CoinPayments since

☑️Our Trading System has been multiple times #1 leader of Zignaly Profit Sharing Marketplace
(Try us with 1$)👇👇

[ZIGChain @ZIGChain]

(1/5) Another week goes out (09 Apr’23) with #BTC trading in a thinner range (27.2K to 28.8K), and giving a very marginal +ve WoW closing to ~$28,320 (+0.54%).
Market participants remained confused about the direction, while volumes remained dry amidst the Easter holidays.😓

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

Remember that quote:
"language models do not inspect intent from a clean moral altitude, they infer meaning through phrasing, context, and precedent."

Especially if you are a lawmaker for AI field.

#LLM #jailbreak

[Rohan Paul @rohanpaul_ai]

Perfect immunity from jailbreak is not possible even for the strongest of LLMs.

New study shows that frontier models are getting harder to jailbreak, but not impossible to jailbreak.

The study attacks Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 with automated red-team tools that keep rewriting harmful prompts until the model either refuses or gives a bad answer.

Fable 5 was more robust than Opus 4.8, with its worst attack success rate at 6.1%, while Opus 4.8 reached 11.5% under the strongest attack.

The hard truth is that avoiding absolutely every jailbreak is practically impossible, because even a tiny failure rate can produce many harmful completions when attacks are automated and repeated at scale.

The most crucial point is, that the old cartoon version of jailbreaks, weird encodings and theatrical role-play, is no longer the main problem.

The surviving weakness is contextual, because adaptive attackers rewrite the request after refusals, searching for a frame the model treats as legitimate rather than dangerous.

That is why perfect immunity is probably the wrong target; language models do not inspect intent from a clean moral altitude, they infer meaning through phrasing, context, and precedent.

In any system this flexible, there will always be boundary cases where a harmful request looks enough like education, safety research, fiction, troubleshooting, or policy analysis to slip through.

----

Link – arxiv. org/abs/2606.18193

Title: "A Red-Team Study of Anthropic Fable 5 & Opus 4.8 Models"

[fejau @fejau_inc]

Crypto industry seeing AI getting rugged by the government

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@gothburz Here is the exact take of Alex Karp that you are referring to https://t.co/hqYoi58QHv

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

"China will read this correctly. Allies will read this correctly."

AI Hybrid Wars protocol initiated.

[SightBringer @_The_Prophet__]

⚡️This is a monster signal.

This is the moment frontier AI stops being treated like software and starts being treated like controlled strategic capability.

The key phrase is not “customers.”

The key phrase is “foreign national Anthropic employees.”

That means the state is no longer only controlling chips, model weights, or overseas access. It is moving into cognition access by nationality. That is the real threshold. The U.S. government is saying the highest models are sensitive enough that even people physically inside the United States, working inside the company, may be barred from touching them if their nationality creates deemed-export risk.

That is weapons-control logic.

This is ITAR logic for intelligence.

The corporate language about a “misunderstanding” is probably diplomacy.

Companies say that when they need to preserve customer trust, employee morale, and regulatory room. But national security authorities do not force emergency suspension of top model access because someone made a minor paperwork mistake.

Something about Fable 5 and Mythos 5 crossed the line: cyber capability, autonomous R&D acceleration, AI-improving-AI utility, bio/security planning, code exploitation, or some blend of all of it.

The U.S. state just showed that Anthropic does not fully control Anthropic’s frontier layer.

That is the phase change.

Labs can brand themselves as public-benefit AI companies. They can talk about safety. They can sell enterprise plans. They can publish model cards. But once the models become national capability, the sovereign arrives. The state does not need to own the company to control the access surface. It only needs legal authority over export, security, procurement, and liability.

This confirms the arc we’ve been tracking:

Frontier AI becomes state-supervised strategic infrastructure.

Public AI splits from strategic AI.

Foreign access gets restricted.

Labs become quasi-defense contractors.

Model access becomes a national security perimeter.

Enterprise customers learn that API access is not property. It is revocable permission inside a sovereign-controlled stack.

The most important implication is organizational.

If foreign national employees can be cut off from frontier systems, AI labs now have to reorganize internally around citizenship, clearance, compartmentalization, and controlled access. That breaks the old Silicon Valley assumption that global talent can freely collaborate around the frontier. The next AI lab structure looks less like Google in 2015 and more like a defense prime crossed with a classified research facility.

For markets, the winners are the national champions with U.S.-aligned infrastructure, cleared customer channels, government relationships, compliance capacity, and domestic compute. The losers are open access, foreign-dependent AI wrappers, offshore model distributors, and any enterprise whose moat depends on unrestricted access to frontier APIs.

For geopolitics, this is escalation. China will read this correctly. Allies will read this correctly. Every serious state will understand that frontier models are now part of national power.

The AI race just moved from “who has the best chatbot” to “who controls cognition as a strategic asset.”

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@rationalaussie "will"?

[BT @_BT_BT_BT_]

In the late 90s, you could only download 1024-bit RSA if you were in the US. Encryption libraries were nerfed for other countries.

Open source eventually made those controls unenforceable, and the US gov folded.

The Fable 5 ban feels like the same thing. Untenable.

Can the path forward for LLMs be decentralized, open model creation?

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@StandDOTtrade Super feature, but Brave Wallet does not allow to deposit, only to connect. Would be nice to get fix for it :)

[Crypto Michael @MichaelXBT]

I have predicted every major Bitcoin move this cycle:

- The 15k bottom
- The 30k-70k rally
- The 65k bull-flag breakout to 110k
- The 74k bottom
- The 98k bottom
- The 107k bottom

New highs are coming very soon

Q4 will be extremely bullish

Doubt me at your own risk

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@h173k Probably we will be back soon

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@h173k Today's live stream was short. Hopefully next time it will be longer

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@h173k He keeps getting liquidated times and times again

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@h173k True!

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@h173k Well deserved!

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

Mass levy needed 😎

[Nic @nicrypto]

We need retail back in the game. fact.

REAL retail.

Not corporates, not funds - normies.

Alt season won't be sustained without them.

Sorry, that’s just how this works.

WAKE UP RETAIL. SERIOUSLY!!!

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

Trump commenting on Sydney Sweeney's politics shows exactly why smart money avoids celebrity-linked investments.

Sometimes one political statement can tank brand value overnight.

This is why our systems focus on fundamentals, not personalities.

#trading #algotrading #tradingsystem

[Tim (Retired Young Now What) @RetiredYoungNW]

Barron Trump and Sydney Sweeney would have some great looking kids.

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@LusiRoy8 Everyone analyzing iPhone 17 Air battery thickness like it matters for performance.

Same energy traders put into analyzing indicators that don't actually predict anything.

Focus on what moves markets, not what looks interesting.

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

iPhone 17 Air choosing thin design over battery life is exactly what most traders do:

Optimize for looks over performance.

Our systems prioritize substance over style.
Would you rather have a pretty portfolio or a profitable one?

#trading #algotrading

[Shishir @ShishirShelke1]

iPhone 17 Air is shaping up to be Apple’s most innovative phone in recent years

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

While Tesla bets $29B on keeping one person, our #algo systems work 24/7 without ego, without demands, without retention packages.

Automation beats hero worship every time - in companies and in #trading.

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

$29 billion retention package?
That's exactly the lottery mentality we avoid in trading.

Tesla's board is gambling on one person instead of building systems that work regardless of who's in charge.
#trading #tesla

[Sawyer Merritt @SawyerMerritt]

BREAKING: Tesla has awarded Elon Musk with an interim pay package of 96 million shares of the company, currently worth about $29 billion.

The award provides the following provisions:
• 96 million restricted shares of stock, subject to Elon paying a purchase price upon meeting a two-year vesting term, to be delivered after receipt of antitrust regulatory approval;
• The purchase price will be equal to the split adjusted exercise price of the stock options awarded to Elon under the 2018 CEO Performance Award ($23.34 per share);
• A requirement that Elon serve continuously in a senior leadership role at Tesla during the two-year vesting term;
• A pledging allowance to cover tax payments or the purchase price;
• A mandatory holding period of five years from the grant date, except to cover tax payments or the purchase price (with any sales for such purposes to be conducted through an orderly disposition in coordination with Tesla); and
• If the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 CEO Performance Award, this interim award will be forfeited or returned or a portion of the 2018 CEO Performance Award will be forfeited. To put it simply, there cannot be any “double dip.” Elon will not be able to keep this new award in addition to the options he will be awarded under the 2018 CEO Performance Award should the courts rule in our favor.

Tesla: "The Board (with Elon and Kimbal Musk recusing themselves), has unanimously approved a recommendation from the Special Committee of the Board to grant Elon an award of restricted stock equal to approximately one-third of the compensation he earned under the 2018 CEO Performance Award.

This interim award is structured to incrementally increase his voting rights upon grant, which he has repeatedly told us—and shareholders have confirmed—is an important part of incentivizing him to stay focused on the critical work we are doing here at Tesla. We believe this is a vital consideration, and we used the tools currently available to us—our existing equity incentive plan—to grant this award

The Special Committee continues our work to address a longer-term CEO compensation strategy, which we plan to put to a shareholder vote at the November 6 annual meeting."

Source: https://t.co/oOgbMDoJcS

[TradeForImpact.com @tradeforimpact]

@RodDMartin @elonmusk Tesla giving Musk $29B reminds me why markets are zero-sum games.
That money comes from shareholders who think they're 'investing' but are really just financing someone else's wealth. Same pattern we see traders chase - someone else always pays.