This book could be called Contradictions of the great traders and still live up to its utility. Won't give you what you want but will guide you how to build what you need. Read and keep revisting.
After many suggestions over the years, I decided to turn my trader principles paper into an e-book. This book condenses the consistent principles of a century of great traders. Quick read that could have a strong impact on your results. Pick up a copy: https://t.co/Hp31rotMJb
@rjpjr12@gfc4 On emotional side, personally I like the stability of doing less and having less rules vs frequently bringing in 'discretion' into the process. Leads to less friction over long term ie many trades. But everyone's different so I understand they might find peace in something else.
@rjpjr12@gfc4 One can propose that after premature folding, one can hop onto something which is actually 'moving' but we all know how that goes in the real time. More decisions usually lead to below average results most of times unless one is a twitter (phantom) trader.
@DThomasStealth tbh, he outlined 2 extremes and as usual, the truth is hiding somewhere in the middle. He has a point but he didn't choose best examples.
@DThomasStealth It's incredibly tough indeed as the game keeps reseting all the time irrespective of the past & success is transient. Unlike conventional careers, trading has much higher risk of demotion/firing lurking all the time.
@gfc4 Don't want to nitpick but from my experience, its a bit more nuanced than this. Your horse just making its mind at the gate vs already bolted a fair distance and now getting into a reverse gear are two v different scenarios imo.
@CFlanders7 Every trader worth his/her salt does π
That lucky jail break which we know we didnt really deserve as we walked into a market choke-hold while fully awake.
@gfc4 Actually, it's not that uncommon in pro-sports (markets are pro sports). Top players always go out of 'form' but their out of form performance is about average/not too bad and then they kill it again when the form returns. Repeat long enough = legend.
@iManasArora@rahul1239320@sumitkbehal OG post's framing reduces trading to intellectual pursuit which is incomplete as best. Sneak check your guru by how excited he got by that post. YKIFK π
@iManasArora@rahul1239320@sumitkbehal Agree w/ Manas. In initial post, he says human laziness leads to moat. Very valid for discretionary trading but then there's systematic/algo trading as well. Still they lose money as still a human takes the final call and getting crushed by emotions.