I 100% believe this AND YET you could not pay me any amount of money in the world to compromise my personal integrity and turn my back on the community in the way @DewayneHankins did. It’s gross to watch.
Hearing Dewayne give those talking points to city council the other day reminded me a lot of hearing Joe defend Micah Nori's contract. Know both of them too well to think either of them believe it but they have a new boss now with a different agenda than their old boss.
@CHold@jjedwards71@dwightjaynes 100% agree with your point on courage. Everyone is operating out of fear. We need to stop acting like we have zero agency in this process. We’re playing against an opponent who is not afraid to use the tools at his disposal. Okay. Let’s use ours.
@NicholasMcKern@blazerbanter Yeah, we’re basically saying the same thing. Remove the hurdles the team is claiming as roadblocks to keep the negotiation moving.
I saw @Elite24hoops respond agreeing with you and wrongly assumed you were on some bullshit. I think he just misunderstood your post lol
@NicholasMcKern@blazerbanter I responded to your other post. I think we’re actually in agreement lol. The only thing I’m clarifying is that the city shouldn’t waive their rights. They can commit to do so upon an agreement. But you can’t just waive them up front.
@NicholasMcKern@blazerbanter I agree with you, but it assumes the team is negotiating in good faith. The city could, and should, state something like “we are not making any determinations on the “first class” status of the arena, but upon the execution of a new lease we agree to relinquish those rights.”
@NicholasMcKern@blazerbanter The “threat of litigation” exists anywhere there is a contractual agreement. Intent to pursue litigation is different than the right to pursue litigation. You don’t give up your contractual rights because the other party doesn’t like those rights. That’s why they are negotiated.
@RUthreteningMe@blazerbanter I think it’s a little different than that. The team has gifted the city a pile of evidence that the current arena is not “first class.” The current lease says that’s the team’s responsibility. If they leave, the city can sue the team for the money to make it first class.
@NicholasMcKern@blazerbanter The same argument applies to the threat of relocation though. The Blazers could say up front that they will not move the team, but that would hurt their leverage. Why would the city voluntarily surrender their rights, up front, just for the right to negotiate?
@DewayneHankins I too would prefer not to have the conversations through the media if my perspective was as ghoulishly greedy, tone deaf and downright disrespectful as this Trail Blazers ownerships is.
If you want the tax payer to give you $600M, prove that you give a damn.
Dewayne Hankins here: "I’d like to turn the rhetoric down and not have these conversations in the media, to be honest."
Anonymous Blazers leadership source to The Oregonian a week ago: "If they don't want us, then that's fine" and "It's not like we lose money moving the team."
@ReptilianHybrid Idk if they’re still up but I used to watch @miziziziz streams when he was making Wrought Flesh and he was making enemy creatures from scratch in blender.
@blazerbanter The Chris Haynes tweet has me even more confused. Starting Dame and Ja together?? Idk man maybe I’m just not a visionary.
Dame/CJ 2.0 this time with less shooting and off ball movement?
@blazerbanter Bill said the name “Moe Harkless” 200x as often once he was traded to the Clippers. Crazy how obvious it is in real time.
The real question is whether or not anyone in the league is actually influenced by Prestige Zone aura when evaluating trades. I suspect not.