@tengri_spirit@FilonenkoOles Сосед по коттеджному поселку вчера вернулся поздно с собрания HOA и ничего не объяснил. Сказал лишь собирать вещи и бежать в Косто за продуктами на две нед��ли. Сейчас едем куда-то далеко из Флориды. Не знаю что происходит, но мне кажется началось…
We're going around the Moon. Come watch with us. Artemis II's four-astronaut crew is lifting off from @NASAKennedy on an approximately 10-day mission that will bring us closer to living on the Moon and Mars. The launch window opens at 6:24pm ET (2224 UTC). https://t.co/X27QJejNDt
First Google found a much better quantum algorithm that'll run on any quantum computer to break elliptic curves. They're not releasing it: they only show they have it with a ZK proof. https://t.co/6OyEDcXq0w
BC just quietly exposed the real game, and it’s NOT about “reconciliation,” “healing,” or “shared prosperity.”
It’s about shifting control of Canada’s critical resources into a three-way partnership between:
1️⃣ Indigenous leadership structures.
2️⃣ Activist governments (BC NDP + Ottawa Liberals/Carney).
3️⃣ Foreign investors, especially China
This isn’t a theory.
It’s written directly into the FNEMC “China Strategy” document. A 14-page blueprint outlining how BC First Nations should build direct economic alliances with Chinese state-owned companies, Chinese capital, and long-term Chinese off-take agreements.
This is the model the @bcndp is now accelerating! With no public control, no stewardship for British Columbians in any way, and this is not shared benefits.
But what this is a fragmented, foreign-leveraged approval system that cuts the Canadian public OUT of the equation entirely.
For decades, Canada and Canadians at all levels have paid trillions into Indigenous programs, settlements, and lands. For context BC alone holds tens of billions in reserve land value locked up in the reserve program.
Yet instead of evolving the system into a unified, transparent, accountable provincial model, BC and the @bcndp is doubling down on a structure that creates:
1. Two layers of law.
2. Race-based governance.
3. Private deals with foreign governments and corporations.
4. Zero accountability to Canadians
A permanent veto on Canadian development.
5. And now the BC NDP is speeding up “critical mineral projects” that will not be owned by British Columbians, not governed by British Columbians, and not benefiting British Columbians.
They will be controlled through a political pipeline of:
➡ Provincial ideology.
➡ Indigenous governance structures.
➡ China’s long-term geopolitical strategy.
My fellow BC'ERS this is how you lose a province. This is how you lose control of your resources. This is how you lose a country. We cannot pretend this is “reconciliation.” We cannot pretend this is “progress.” We cannot pretend this is “justice.”
This is outsourcing sovereignty under the cover of emotional language and manufactured guilt.
It's about time to end the race-based carve-outs, the two-tier legal system, the external political influence, and the never-ending industry around “reconciliation.”
Time to return to one Canada, one law, one standard, where every community, Indigenous or not, is part of the same national project from villages to towns to municipalities to the provinces, territories to the federal levels.
BC belongs to British Columbians.
Canada belongs to Canadians.
Full stop. Last point, there is only one person and party actually talking about this ina. Proactive and positive way of evolving and ending the corruption - @One_BCHQ@Dallas_Brodie@wyatt_claypool
Let's rally behind real change for BC that will benefit all?!?
Read for yourself and tell me if I missed anything?
https://t.co/C5whMdwiR4
When I was on the ISS for my nearly year long mission, there was a telomere experiment comparing my telomeres to my earth baseline and my twin brother as a control. Hypothesis was they would get damaged and worse due to the environment. Turns out they got better. Initially NASA thought maybe it was due to exercise and diet. After I returned we learned JAXA had a telomere experiment on some small worms the same time I was there. Their telomeres got better too. Never saw the worms doing any exercise. After further study determined it was the radiation.
@moistlytrudeau Флорида. У младшей температура была два дня. Повезли в Urgent Care. Клиник много, выбирали по rating. Очереди не было. Ноль уплаты (страховка от работы). Тест на грип на месте. Доктор заказал антивирусное в указанной аптеке, которое забрали по дороге домой (18 USD).
BREASTMILK
She thought she was studying milk.
What she uncovered was a conversation.
In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinary—until one pattern refused to go away.
Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein.
Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances.
It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus.
Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence.
But Katie trusted the data.
And the data pointed to a radical idea.
Milk is not just nutrition.
It is information.
For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby?
Katie kept digging.
Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone.
The babies who drank it grew faster.
They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious.
Milk wasn’t just building bodies.
It was shaping behavior.
Then came the discovery that changed everything.
When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infant’s immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the mother’s body detects it.
Within hours, the milk changes.
White blood cells surge.
Macrophages multiply.
Targeted antibodies appear.
When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline.
This was not coincidence.
It was call and response.
A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisible—until someone thought to listen.
As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The first food every human consumes.
The substance that shaped our species.
Largely ignored.
So she did something bold.
She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk.
It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped.
The discoveries kept coming.
Milk changes by time of day.
Foremilk differs from hindmilk.
Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies can’t digest—because they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria.
Every mother’s milk is biologically unique.
In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflix’s Babies. Today, at Arizona State University’s Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health.
The implications are staggering.
Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced.
Katie Hinde didn’t just study milk.
She revealed that nourishment is intelligence.
A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak.
All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was “measurement error.”
Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.