Tim Garcia

Eckhart Tolle, Conversations with God, Course In Miracles, ACIM, Jesus.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@elonmusk One radical idea to consider: remove visibility of the number of followers and remove "likes"; focus on the content: the tweets and textual responses to those tweets. Incentivize organic, considered reaction rather than groupthink & chasing numbers or claps.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@DeanMackeyX I see no dissect here at all. I’m rooting for the Knicks, but I have high respect for the Spurs as an organization and saw nothing in this video that was objectionable.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@shadeycat247 @OceanRasso How so? By applying the SAME standard, they BOTH come up SHORT of “decent” and “laudable.”

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@jason_howerton While Paxton’s adultery is gross given what he claims to value, that’s not the problem with his candidacy; it’s not “personal” baggage that makes him unsuitable for public office, but his public corruption which led to the Republican-led Texas House impeaching him.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@shadeycat247 @OceanRasso It was an ad hominem attack written poorly and with profanity. It was Trump-like word vomit taken down a notch from even his drivel. If Democrats are just as coarse and gross as the president, or even worse, then truly the republic is dead and voting is rather pointless.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@AftgalleyGreg @GovPressOffice @m72953176 He hasn’t fixed any messes — just made bigger messes and new ones, too.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@AZ_Brittney Lost.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@TheDemocrats @StephenM You really can do better than that. I hope Talarico doesn’t follow your lead or his slim chance of winning will evaporate. You don’t fight ugly with ugly without debasing yourself. If that approach wins — we are ALL losers, truly.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@LisaMesa14 @mtgreenee He did NOT say in his resignation letter that “Iran was not a threat” but rather than Iran was not “an imminent threat” — that’s a HUGE difference both LEGALLY (“imminent threat” gives POTUS power to act without approval from Congress) and strategically.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@MeidasTouch That's not just a "programming note", c'mon, Ben & co -- Ben, specifically, you had a podcast you did with him and you seemed genuinely close as colleagues -- WTH? You have to be transparent more than this or I will begin to doubt YOU guys as well.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@RightScopee No. We are not mercenaries. We do what we do because of our values and our interests.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@SLNTnomore @GovPressOffice LOL... also, #1 largest economy in the nation, #1 in # of college graduates... I mean, when you are literally the #1 most populous state in the nation by far, you will by definition be #1 in MOST things which are directly proportional to the population.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@TrumpsHurricane Greetings, brother.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@MOSELEY1981 @RightScopee Well, calling it the “Gulf of AMERICA” doesn’t really do establish anything about the U.S. when you understand that Mexico and other nations in Central AMERICA that border the Gulf are also AMERICAN literally, because they’re part of the AMERICAS.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@pamadkisson @RightScopee Mexico and all of CENTRAL AMERICA are American — just remember that — “the Gulf of America” doesn’t mean “the Gulf of the U.S.A.,” if you understand that the entire western hemisphere consists of North America and South America as continents, not nation states.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@RonnieG16265314 @RightScopee Well, no, that’s not factually true in our constitutional system. The president is merely the head of one-third of the government which runs the country. We also have Congress and the Courts, which are co-equal branches to the executive branch.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@RightScopee “Gulf of America” actually makes sense as a label given that Mexico and ALL of Central AMERICA are American, strictly speaking. But why do you ask? What does it mean to you for it to be relabeled by Google?

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@unbiasedpresss @MAGAVoice So do it! I’ll support you. The federal government neither started nor subsidizes “Pride Month”, and has no control over it at all! It was started by PEOPLE. PEOPLE are also free to start “Veterans Month”, there’s nothing stopping that.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@deficrypto80 @MAGAVoice You don’t “get 1 day,” you have taxpayers paid veteran’s benefits (which I support) and one federally recognized holiday. LGBT have no taxpayer-paid benefits for being LGBT nor any federally recognized day much less a month.

[Tim Garcia @trellus]

@MAGAVoice That’s apple and cars — they operate in different domains. “Pride Month” is not a federal holiday, so there is no way to “abolish” it in the first place & anyone can establish “Veterans’ Month” like a “Pride Month” — so do it if you feel that strongly about it and I’ll support u