@RuprechtIii@PatsyDiabetes@BTCDumbMoneyAPE π
But you missed 'Breaking news' not 'Braking'.π
I don't believe NursePatsy is a notary public for a second. I hope she's not, and not a nurse, either. Too dumb & high risk to be in a job of that import.
@BradWilcoxIFS@unfragilekids@FamStudies Facts aren't all in, but it seems possible they gave her what she wanted.
Elsewhere I read 'She should have been able to show up naked and not been raped'. I agree.
Ironically, if she had shown up naked and saying 'Help! A migrant raped me!', then they would've helped.
@preposterousbbg Two were expelled, for "sexual misconduct".
None were originally prosecuted because it was consensual according to Jane Doe's own statement.
@RepMikeLawler It WAS referred to 'qualified law enforcement' (the DA), who recently explained in a long post why criminal charges were not brought.
Please do at least a modicum of reading before posting self-aggrandizing and inflammatory comments.
Can we agree that young people, men & women both, should think about the types of activities they want to engage in (and the chemicals they want to imbibe) BEFORE they go they go out and get 'caught up in the moment'?
Re: the 'Cornell 7' we all want justice. That is in common.
Two of the guys were soon expelled for "sexual misconduct" (making Jane Doe's account seem more consistent).
But I asked Grok if that differed from rape, and if so, how?
Bottom line (of a long response):
Re: the 'Cornell 7' we all want justice. That we have in common.
To those defending the guys, saying Jane Doe's story is inconsistent: are you aware two of them were expelled?
@Grok Is there evidence two of the 'Cornell 7' were expelled, or is that just what Jane Doe's lawyer said?
@PeppermillKB@itslinklauren I believe two of them were expelled, at least according to Jane Doe's lawyer.
So I'm wondering whether her story is as inconsistent as the guys' defenders are claiming.
https://t.co/1cixz7Sfpw
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 I think you meant "Biden-Harris", not "Bush-Harris".
But yeah, no matter how AP tries to spin it, Trump isn't against letting in refugees let alone legal migrants. Two of his wives are/were migrants.
He just thinks it ought to be done with common sense and in a controlled manner
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 Which is all great.
But by the way, she did also say they'd been there for two or three years, so they did come in under the Biden/Harris admin.
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 So Bartollotta's point is that the Haitian immigrants in Charleroi:
1- aren't illegals
2- aren't causing problems
3- and aren't taking jobs from locals
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 I don't know what an "Abbott Drop" is and a quick google search only brought me a bunch of eye drops π€£.
But I assume it's a quick and more recent dump of busloads of illegal and/or poorly-vetted immigrants?
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 Thanks for that π.
Two things about the Newsweek article:
1- It's consistent with the Rawnews one & has the same quotes, etc., which is good. More reliable.
2- It's longer and does provide clarity to what Bartollotta was trying to say.
@NHrynenko02@Made_YourDay_@charliekirk11 Is she trying to say they migrated before the Biden/Harris admin?
(by the way, I think both sources are poor. I know LibsofTiktoc is biased and propagandist; RawStory doesn't have a good reputation, either).