Solo 🥀

Don’t take Twitter too seriously

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@tat2god1 @LawlessNationX @scotus_wire Sure but the analogy considers can it and why or why not. What in the constitution prohibits it?

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@SteveFreed13 Be performative. May also have fathers on your follower list. It’s social media man all of this is weird.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@LawlessNationX @scotus_wire But the question is why? I posit two reasons. One, the class of people (any age?) seems overly harsh. A five year old could face punishment under this law. Secondly, the proportionality of the punishment to the crime seems wildly off. Is it your position that neither matter?

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@LawlessNationX @scotus_wire This argument seems mostly correct, but I’m not sure it’s this easy. Consider a law that proposed to execute people of any age for jaywalking. Under your interpretation, this would not be in violation of the 8A, as long as the means of execution were humane. That seems wrong.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@MSG_Jack_Dona @derek_debus @votewarren The AG is not a trial attorney. Wouldn’t matter.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@M5squared @RachelBitecofer Public humiliation in person and on social media doesn’t help the kid either. Just builds resentment.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@UnderwaterSquad @StoneBridge49_ Sure, but so was everyone around this time.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@Atoledo38Jandro @OnCallStepDadd1 @spicebae_ Even 50/50 custody if the father gets it, does not mean 50/50 visitation.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@Atoledo38Jandro @OnCallStepDadd1 @spicebae_ Because the family code and equity deems mother as central to child rearing. Therefore, she will by default get primary custody of the children barring extenuating circumstances.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@yoxics It gets to a point man

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@justinAB_SF Lol multiple studies with confounding results is the definition of a picture not being clear but what I will say is that you should feel significant muscle fatigue before you stop your set. Super close to failure seems almost certainly not required to build hypertrophy. God bless

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@Proustoevsky @justinAB_SF I’ve read multiple studies that do not align with this conclusion, but you guys will continue to say that like it’s gospel. Have a good one.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@justinAB_SF As far as volume being accounted for in this new meta, I’d be skeptical and I’m curious how they proposed to do that, but I’ll take your word for it as my institution doesn’t have this article. The bottom line is that the picture is far from as clear as you try and make it seem.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@justinAB_SF The study I’m citing had participants stop based on estimated feeling of muscle fatigue even when they knew they had maximally more reps. That’s where the 50-75 number comes from. Furthermore, nature of meta is that the studies used multiple methods for non-failure.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@Proustoevsky @justinAB_SF And those people are still seeing muscle growth, which is why what we call failure is usually more like somewhere in the upper range of %50-75 assuming lower rep sets. This still clearly leads to hyper trophy.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@justinAB_SF Study showed the opposite https://t.co/ed1ubfcAnw
And in the studies you are talking about the extra hypertrophy gains are likely attributable to overall volume rather than going to failure. See https://t.co/H38alW4kEm where equalized RT volumes produced no difference.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@ClarenceMaximus @KaijuSurprise Ahh yes we’ve reached all of CT’s haters know nothing about him. Not like me I’m so very smart and know every opinion word for word. And with this nonsense, I’m out. Carry on.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@justinAB_SF The studies show it isn’t even really close to failure, either. No meaningful difference between 50 to 75% set and set close to failure for muscle growth. Hypertrophy occurs after stimulation, which happens much less than at failure. Study after study consistently shows this.

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@ClarenceMaximus @KaijuSurprise It’s implied…

[Solo 🥀 @Trillest115]

@ClarenceMaximus @KaijuSurprise He sure says that.