@IL_fella@thebearpundit And btw, I do agree with her that focus should be on diplomatic solution to ๐บ๐ฆ/๐ท๐บ. I disagree with her that we shouldn't send weapons to ๐บ๐ฆ and I think the criticism of US is a fact that Putin uses as a (false) justification of the invasion. But yeah, she's not a good candidate.
@IL_fella@thebearpundit 1. I would vote for her in this race if that's what you are asking
2. I don't agree that just because someone uses talking points Russia uses, they are pro-Russia. Such logic leads to a lot of bs in my experience.
3. That is true, but I can't support a candidate who supports ๐ฎ๐ฑ
@IL_fella@thebearpundit 1. I didn't say I support her
2. How is she anti-๐บ๐ฆ? I've seen criticism of US involment after the cold war and support for antimilitaristic/diplomatic resolution. I don't agree with her on this but it's not a braindead take
3. Her opponent voted for offensive weapons to ๐ฎ๐ฑ
@davidslosttt DSA member gets popular (as an independent) with a lot of dems after some conservative dem wins the primary and then republicans flock to vote for the conservative dem to prevent DSA presidency
@strmsek69@Aspen1921 If you think that how would you explain party switch and changing regional patterns? Sure, party allegiance exists but I think you overstate it.