“A king…would have had pity on our poor, exhausted, bloodlet nation…democracy is without a heart…When serving the powers of money, it is pitiless and inhuman.”
Prayer as resistance, the necessary condition that summons "what must pass". As such, absence is the oracle (Latin oraculum "to pray"). Absence is not nothing but the missing condition that organises search, constraint and meaning.
Prayer orders attention and desire into an explicit interface: an interrogation that defines what is absent, salient, sign, admissible and actionable.
Prayer "centers" around what is not there, what is missing.
Meaning is not in the smooth sentence. Meaning is in the constraint that survives the sentence.
Absence is the oracle.
@EngelsbergIdeas@edwardstrngr65 Well you conclude with “man-machine team”, which suggests you think AI can’t eliminate the need for (good, genius if you like) human judgment. I imagine that in war, you can’t or shouldn’t always hedge maximally your bets.
@bouvard38829538 Don’t the states control who can be on the ballots? Whatever police choose to enforce a court or congressional order? Whatever bureaucracies refuse to take orders?
@bouvard38829538 The intellectual discipline that made them somewhat civilised also gave them the means and justification to kill millions. Paradox of deferral. E.g. the learned Eric Hobsbawm saying the deaths were necessary, if only…. Will the woke be able to kill as many?
@jkenney How does Parliament govern? Those who administer and interpret the laws govern, not those who debate legislation. Parliament merely holds the power to vote confidence and change the government, ever since they were a party of civil war and regicide (17thC.)
@FortySacks PM with a majority government is not going to cut it. Whatever you want to do, first have to build a system of government with a secure sovereign, not one that gets turned over quickly enough by media/experts/judiciary/elections. In our federal system the courts ultimately rule.
@_kruptos You mean owner-operated capitalism? But maybe the essence of capitalism is central banking and the market in government debt. Wars grow and shrink those markets.
@KemtrupTweets All this said with no accounting of what was involved in the origin of specifically human language; whatever degree of freedom humans have is a question of how we do things with language, whether in ritual, law or disciplinary innovation.
LLMs make plausible signs almost infinitely reproducible. Like money, increased liquidity quickly threatens legitimacy. When no owner recognises it, no "oracle-center" clears its claims, then it has no value. AI is a non-covenantal. People must provide convenants.
@bouvard38829538 Ok, but to police the boundaries of a liberal order, there is not simply a war on “the haters” but a need to mediate (vaguely refigure) revolutionary desires, in part because there’s some awareness that “the haters” hate the intolerant, i.e. you, the woke, so ideas can escalate…
@bouvard38829538 An origin for some woke moves, yet you’d find others in the French or Puritan revolutions. But if antislavery were a move of certain parts of British capital that you could also link to the Brit preference for the Confederacy in the 1860s, it would be a good story.
@TheBlackHorse65 I used to study in Fort Book, long ago, but long since they stopped using the network of pneumatic tubes to marshall books. That would have been impressive to see.
@slooperbia50068@centerstudy_ If center study is right that there’s no (self-regulating) economy, only debt to the centre then it’s a question of what is real, what is possible in terms of expanding/recognizing debts, whether we can move beyond a monetary system with ai, less about events playing in favour.
@slooperbia50068@centerstudy_ Doesn’t want the out of seeing if trade imbalances which the big uniparty state favoured (a huge political apparatus whose consumption is paid for with US debt) can be maintained by slowly inflating the debt away; rather Trump wants to service debt with new forms of productivity