Always thought Keir Starmer was a wet lettuce leaf but after seeing his resignation speech I get why people call him a psychopath. Brother actually had the gall to say:
"We changed our party, ripping out the poison of antisemitism, restoring trust in the economy, defence, and national security. And becoming a party that once again stood proudly with, not against, our national flag…
I will also give my successor my full and unequivocal support knowing that they will inherit a Britain that is far stronger and fairer than the one I inherited two years ago..."
The man is deluded. A narcissistic, gaslighting wet lettuce leaf.
Today “Rainbow Action Tamaki” sent me a letter threatening legal action against my previous post calling them a self-important, egotistical, bunch of rent-a-crowd protesters when they protested about NZFirst’s definition of a woman bill last Sunday.
They want me to delete my post, apologise, and donate money to their ‘charity’.
My post is now passing 1.7million views on Facebook. So no. I won’t be deleting it with all the positive responses it is receiving from kiwis with common sense who are backing our stance.
We also won’t be donating any money to their cause mainly due to not knowing which kind of flag it will be spent purchasing seeing as they can’t make their mind up what protest they are at.
And as for me saying I’m sorry:
I am sorry. I am sorry that you have proven us right. Your egos know no bounds.
I called you a bunch of egotistical mouth-breathers who think the universe revolves around you – and this threat of legal action, thinking that you are the most important thing in this whole conversation, is precisely why ordinary kiwis have had a gutsful of you and your rent-a-crowd.
If you want to take me to court, go ahead, we will ensure we use discovery to read all the emails and communications you had with the Green Party and whomever else you coordinate with and find out who is really behind all of this.
And for the last time, this isn’t about you. We couldn’t give a rat’s derriere about what you do in your private lives, what colour you want to dye your hair, or whether you want to identify as they or them or a lamppost.
Our stance and our bill is about the rights, safety, and protection of women and girls who want safe spaces and bathrooms, fairness in sports, and to protect their rights as women. If you seriously want to protest against that cause then you will find yourself on the wrong side of history.
We would wish you luck in your journey to figure that out, but it seems you would be too stupid to know what to do with it.
TOP wants to tax your grandma thousands per year because they think property appreciation is "making money".
"Ah well they can always downsize". To what? A coffin?
This is Marxism.
What possible excuse could Rakesh Naidoo have for hiding his Labour ambitions from his superiors for months and failing to notify them the instant he responded to the Party’s initial overtures?
It increasingly appears the only plausible explanation is that the entire process was deliberately concealed and stage-managed by Chris Hipkins and the Labour Party - carefully timed to ambush the govt and generate maximum embarrassment, and harvest cheap political points. All at the expense of public trust and the Police’s impartiality.
This is farcical.
True to form, Labour has once again demonstrated staggering incompetence by announcing a $65 million public transport fare cap without any modelling on how many passengers will actually take enough trips to exceed it.
Transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere was asked a straightforward question.
“What proportion of commuters will take enough trips to exceed the cap?”
Utikere: I think a number will… it’s unknown at this stage”
Unbelievably, there is zero modelling on this critical detail.
Typical Labour incompetence. Announce the giveaway, skip the basics.
@caseycravens Thank fuck for that. If it was a teacher our kids would be even dumber. You're just fucked off you haven't got any Government contracts. Ya tool
Their contempt for voters is extraordinary!
Labour admits it will not release ‘cornerstone’ policy costing and job modelling until after the election, blames Treaty of Waitangi concerns https://t.co/UVnhDrES55
Chris Hipkins once again omitted key facts as he misled Ryan Bridge this morning.
Hipkins claimed Labour didn’t “block” fast-track renewable projects and that National’s attacks were “simply made up” and desperate. He even cited the Clerk of the House regarding the fast-track bill. Yes, there was a procedural dispute over listing specific projects, but the Speaker overruled it, noting that virtually every bill confers some private benefit and that the projects would still face expert panel assessment.
However, Labour voted against the entire Fast-track Approvals Act — the very legislation that listed around 22 renewable energy projects (wind, hydro, and others) for accelerated approval. You cannot credibly claim to support renewables while voting down the bill specifically designed to deliver them.
Hipkins’ reference to the Clerk’s advice is highly selective. A procedural spat that was ultimately overruled does not erase Labour’s broader opposition, which centred on “weak safeguards,” Treaty issues, and the “war on nature” rhetoric Labour promoted on social media.
By voting no, Labour delayed progress on the renewable projects bundled into that bill. No amount of blame-shifting can rewrite the parliamentary record.