Truth

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TyrantOppressor Hey ling worshipper,

Where do you see sexual jokes?

Did you eat too much cow dung.?

[Truth @truth_8080]

@sjames8797 @JahidaSumi @Jvnior @grok You have made some assumptions without any proof.

First learn how proof works with scientific methods then come back

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TheDemSlayer @Jvnior Hey Jakey retard,

By your stupid logic almost all men from ancient age to recent say 100 years back were pedophile.

Do some research before opening your low IQ trunk

[Truth @truth_8080]

@MaxLonged @EvaVlaar Don't lie and depot yourself to hell

https://t.co/jjkmzURrHP

[DOAM @doamuslims]

UPDATE: Dutch Police Attack Two Musim Women Without Provocation: Debunking Misinformation Spreading Online

Regarding the incident where two Muslim women were assaulted by Dutch police in Utrecht, there have been false information spreading online (including far-right accounts) accusing the Muslim women of being thieves and thus justifying the brutal assault. This is completely untrue!

According to the lawyer of the victims Anis Boumanjal:

“In response to the police incident that took place on Monday, 26 January 2026, beneath the Bollendak at Hoog Catharijne in Utrecht, the individuals involved feel compelled to respond to rumours and speculation currently circulating on social media.

In various online messages, it is suggested that the police intervention was related to an alleged theft by one or both of the women. This suggestion is entirely incorrect. One of the women was detained solely on suspicion of insulting a public official in the performance of their duties. There was no theft, nor has any such suspicion been communicated or recorded by the police. These rumours lack any factual basis and contribute to the further stigmatisation of those involved.
As can be seen in the circulating video footage, physical force was used by a police officer during the incident, including kicking one of the women and striking with a baton. The police have since confirmed that the officer's conduct is under investigation and being assessed in accordance with the applicable official instructions.
The two women have discussed with the police their intention to file formal complaints for (attempted) aggravated assault and violation of official police conduct regulations. In addition, they report discriminatory remarks made prior to and during the incident involving the use of force. The Dutch National Police Internal Investigations Department (Rijksrecherche) has stated that the women will be invited in the near future to formally record their complaints, with the aim of conducting a thorough criminal investigation into the police conduct and, consequently, criminal prosecution.”

[Truth @truth_8080]

@Wisdom_HQ @EvaVlaar Don't lie
https://t.co/jjkmzURrHP

[DOAM @doamuslims]

UPDATE: Dutch Police Attack Two Musim Women Without Provocation: Debunking Misinformation Spreading Online

Regarding the incident where two Muslim women were assaulted by Dutch police in Utrecht, there have been false information spreading online (including far-right accounts) accusing the Muslim women of being thieves and thus justifying the brutal assault. This is completely untrue!

According to the lawyer of the victims Anis Boumanjal:

“In response to the police incident that took place on Monday, 26 January 2026, beneath the Bollendak at Hoog Catharijne in Utrecht, the individuals involved feel compelled to respond to rumours and speculation currently circulating on social media.

In various online messages, it is suggested that the police intervention was related to an alleged theft by one or both of the women. This suggestion is entirely incorrect. One of the women was detained solely on suspicion of insulting a public official in the performance of their duties. There was no theft, nor has any such suspicion been communicated or recorded by the police. These rumours lack any factual basis and contribute to the further stigmatisation of those involved.
As can be seen in the circulating video footage, physical force was used by a police officer during the incident, including kicking one of the women and striking with a baton. The police have since confirmed that the officer's conduct is under investigation and being assessed in accordance with the applicable official instructions.
The two women have discussed with the police their intention to file formal complaints for (attempted) aggravated assault and violation of official police conduct regulations. In addition, they report discriminatory remarks made prior to and during the incident involving the use of force. The Dutch National Police Internal Investigations Department (Rijksrecherche) has stated that the women will be invited in the near future to formally record their complaints, with the aim of conducting a thorough criminal investigation into the police conduct and, consequently, criminal prosecution.”

[Truth @truth_8080]

@rackstm_ @EvaVlaar Lies after lies

https://t.co/jjkmzURrHP

[DOAM @doamuslims]

UPDATE: Dutch Police Attack Two Musim Women Without Provocation: Debunking Misinformation Spreading Online

Regarding the incident where two Muslim women were assaulted by Dutch police in Utrecht, there have been false information spreading online (including far-right accounts) accusing the Muslim women of being thieves and thus justifying the brutal assault. This is completely untrue!

According to the lawyer of the victims Anis Boumanjal:

“In response to the police incident that took place on Monday, 26 January 2026, beneath the Bollendak at Hoog Catharijne in Utrecht, the individuals involved feel compelled to respond to rumours and speculation currently circulating on social media.

In various online messages, it is suggested that the police intervention was related to an alleged theft by one or both of the women. This suggestion is entirely incorrect. One of the women was detained solely on suspicion of insulting a public official in the performance of their duties. There was no theft, nor has any such suspicion been communicated or recorded by the police. These rumours lack any factual basis and contribute to the further stigmatisation of those involved.
As can be seen in the circulating video footage, physical force was used by a police officer during the incident, including kicking one of the women and striking with a baton. The police have since confirmed that the officer's conduct is under investigation and being assessed in accordance with the applicable official instructions.
The two women have discussed with the police their intention to file formal complaints for (attempted) aggravated assault and violation of official police conduct regulations. In addition, they report discriminatory remarks made prior to and during the incident involving the use of force. The Dutch National Police Internal Investigations Department (Rijksrecherche) has stated that the women will be invited in the near future to formally record their complaints, with the aim of conducting a thorough criminal investigation into the police conduct and, consequently, criminal prosecution.”

[Truth @truth_8080]

@EvaVlaar Hey Eva don't lie

https://t.co/jjkmzURrHP

[DOAM @doamuslims]

UPDATE: Dutch Police Attack Two Musim Women Without Provocation: Debunking Misinformation Spreading Online

Regarding the incident where two Muslim women were assaulted by Dutch police in Utrecht, there have been false information spreading online (including far-right accounts) accusing the Muslim women of being thieves and thus justifying the brutal assault. This is completely untrue!

According to the lawyer of the victims Anis Boumanjal:

“In response to the police incident that took place on Monday, 26 January 2026, beneath the Bollendak at Hoog Catharijne in Utrecht, the individuals involved feel compelled to respond to rumours and speculation currently circulating on social media.

In various online messages, it is suggested that the police intervention was related to an alleged theft by one or both of the women. This suggestion is entirely incorrect. One of the women was detained solely on suspicion of insulting a public official in the performance of their duties. There was no theft, nor has any such suspicion been communicated or recorded by the police. These rumours lack any factual basis and contribute to the further stigmatisation of those involved.
As can be seen in the circulating video footage, physical force was used by a police officer during the incident, including kicking one of the women and striking with a baton. The police have since confirmed that the officer's conduct is under investigation and being assessed in accordance with the applicable official instructions.
The two women have discussed with the police their intention to file formal complaints for (attempted) aggravated assault and violation of official police conduct regulations. In addition, they report discriminatory remarks made prior to and during the incident involving the use of force. The Dutch National Police Internal Investigations Department (Rijksrecherche) has stated that the women will be invited in the near future to formally record their complaints, with the aim of conducting a thorough criminal investigation into the police conduct and, consequently, criminal prosecution.”

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF The deaf can't listen nor the blind can see.

Indian muslim? You are one of those low IQ nobody retard, who waffles without any clarity.

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Let's assume you are a "Christian".

Do you agree with ancestors who commited "child marriage"? Or your biblical scholars?

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF https://t.co/JCNIybsu8g

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF I don't deal with shit eating j33ts.

First don't lerp as an Italian.

2nd don't rape.

3rd don't marry off your daughthers to dogs.

4th don't kill for eating beef

5th don't be a pagan

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF I don't deal with shit eating j33ts.

First don't lerp as an Italian.

2nd don't rape.

3rd don't marry off your daughthers to dogs.

4th don't kill for eating beef

5th don't be a pagan

[Truth @truth_8080]

@AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Hey bud, I have all the answers for your questions.

But I want to untangle your hidden assumptions so you can identify the truth yourself.

Can we proceed?

[Truth @truth_8080]

@AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Age of puberty is nice default.

But my question was about a timeless verified standard. Do we have anything like this for the term "child"?

[Truth @truth_8080]

@AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF OK, so we have 2 terms, "rape" and "child". So I assume it was a marriage but by your standard it's pedophilia.

Now define the term "child" that's approved by all cultures across times verified by a peer reviewed scientific journal.

Go.

[Truth @truth_8080]

@TrojanMario64 @AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Hey retard, answer first else move on.

[Truth @truth_8080]

@AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Answer again, did your father raped your mom by marriage?

Let's settle the terms first.

[Truth @truth_8080]

@RHuisman5 @trtworld They didn't steal. If you say otherwise, show us your proof!

[Truth @truth_8080]

@AnthonyPWallace @hamdanahmedd @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF First when did a marriage become a rape? Did your father rape your mom by marriage or they didn't have a marriage?

[Truth @truth_8080]

@Jvstice0 @mohammed_hijab @JaydaBF Yet he is natively rooted in Britain unlike most of you "Dave"s