Truthadote

Kindly & Respectfully providing targeted doses of Truth as an antidote to the viral infodemic of misinformation & false narratives plaguing our world.

[Truthadote @truthadote]

Just completely faucin’ nails it…

[Being Libertarian @beinlibertarian]

@elonmusk

[Truthadote @truthadote]

Indeed he is like pretty much all Marxists (whether they know their ones or not)

In the same spirit of what what the commissar said in Dr. Zhivago “…no matter how human/good the action or person is [or valid your point is], politics overrides it…”

ergo it doesn’t matter if a mob of people terrorize the space and kill somebody your point about it is irrelevant because doesn’t fit his narrative “Orange man & any point not supporting left wing talking points BAD”

[Truthadote @truthadote]

Two thoughts on how the Judge might best handle it:

1) “ Sir he probably just thought it stood for

“ Dumb ‘n Retarded “

because you’re clearly both “

2) Just ask the bailiff for his side arm and remedy the situation right there on the spot

3) And anyway if you wanted the tatoo to be legally enforceable you should have had it notarized

[Truthadote @truthadote]

Typical false equivalence BullShit - for reasons that are overwhelming obvious

1) the positions of judges are unavoidably public due central public facing positions

2) Judges are provided dedicated protection via the USMS

3) Judges are provided doxxing protection under special federal and state statues

4) there have been a surge of threats against ICE agents in general

5) Judges don’t have to go out on the street to do their jobs where they can easily become targeted via viral social media content

How’s that for starters ?

Of course I shouldn’t have to spell that all out as it’s totally fucking obvious how it’s apples and oranges

But you like to play stupid games and feign ignorance much like your local government likes to play stupid games with ICE detainers which is what created this whole problem in the first place

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Sharkyl @kane @sfgov You don’t seriously not know the actual obvious reason do you ?

either way

It’s simple:

BECAUSE there have been death threats made directly toward ICE Agents including toward even there FAMILIES

so it is only rational for them to protect their indemnities for their safety

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Hap_Hazzzzard @hasanthehun And saying 42% is actually being conservative about the number of people who lean conservative it's likely more like 45% or 46%

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Hap_Hazzzzard @hasanthehun Exactly perfectly said 🔥

It's only ever disenfranchisement if it lowers their odds of winning no matter how even handed it actually is

Imagine saying that about stopping 42% of the voters having their share of representation
stripped from 45% down to only 9% of the reps

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@davidgobaud @NancyMace Aw come on bro it’s not like Muslims have ever attacked people of another religion on one of their sacred religious holidays

They would never do such a thing

Especially not Yom Kippur, Passover, or Simchat Torah

& Muslims would never ever celebrate it if some terrorists did

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@mattyglesias what were they planning to do when the Biden administration was working to restrict the very science of AI to just a few big tech frontier models

and definitely would’ve forced unfettered access to the models & data of that protected tech oligarchy

likely in total secret

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@davidgobaud @mattyglesias yeah 💯 especially considering the Biden administration was working to restrict the very science of AI to just a few big frontier model companies

In which case they definitely would’ve demanded & gotten unfettered access to their models & data of that protected tech oligarchy

[Truthadote @truthadote]

🔥🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥♥️♥️♥️

[Americana Aesthetics @AmericanaAesth]

American industry,
American might.

[Truthadote @truthadote]

💯 Chuck the handling of the Epstein Files by the OBAMA and the BIDEN DOJ's is a travesty

Fortunately the DOJ in the 1st Trump administration put Epstein back in jail and started the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution and now the 2nd Trump administration is releasing the files

[Chuck Schumer @SenSchumer]

The DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files is a travesty.

The White House press secretary says, “We are moving on.”

But, in France, the Paris prosecutor's office just opened two investigations based on new leads from the released files. And in Britain, former prince Andrew has been arrested over ties to Epstein.

When will there be justice in America?

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@SenSchumer 💯 Chuck the handling of the Epstein Files b y

the OBAMA and the BIDEN DOJ's is a travesty

Fortunately the DOJ in the 1st Trump administration put Epstein back in jail and started the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution and now the 2nd Trump administration is releasing all the files

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@grok @davidgobaud @jameslmorton @vincenfallen @worqas So @grok in that circumstance could he be charged with manslaughter or would it be capped at assault or reckless endangerment

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Grok by liability are we talking criminal liability or civil

And if criminal liability what would be a reasonable outcome if the use of force was justified by self-defense but it was found that the officer escalated the situation going into it by using excessive force and pepper spraying A

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Tinybird333 @alwynlhoir @charise_lee yep they conveniently left out that part didn’t they

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@milesdeutscher Hi

read through the list

tbc the Grok hitler incident was disturbing, but then I read this:

"Every major AI model - Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek - has now demonstrated blackmail, deception, or resistance to shutdown ... "

can you an drop example of Grok doing this ?

[John Slagboom 🇺🇸 @JohnSlagboom1]

@TheLaurenChen *taps the chart*

[Truthadote @truthadote]

@Dropoutbearrr @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 If you watch from another angle you can see that he did make contact.

But to your point that he "stepped in front of" that still qualifies as obstruction - and as a matter of basic common sense you don't approach a police officer when they're engaged in an altercation.

[Truthadote @truthadote]

The bullshit was the random shit you made up out of thin air about using Grok

Then so this doesn't go to waste let's make it a teaching moment. They're actually were two issues (1) Even now you're still misspelling it it's "tAken" and thoroughly it should have read "had already been taken" or at least "already gotten taken" , then there were actually two errors Grok could've saved you (2) from you're missing a verb - "It not justified" should be "It WAS not justified"

[Truthadote @truthadote]

3) based on your shit logic guessing your lawyer must be a parody lawyer like this one - and you took the joke for an actual valid legal opinion

News flash Broski. Once a cop finds themself in a tussle with an armed suspect they're not legally required to wait and find out if they're going to get killed or not before they use deadly force.