truthscan

investigating the claims of science, culture and religion.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@ESchrade41275 @megbasham “Hypocrisy”? lol. We’re obviously blind to your double standards. So are you! 🫡👌🏽😉

[truthscan @truthscan]

@ESchrade41275 @megbasham Ah ok. So you’re happy to make scriptural allusions that support your view. But when scriptural allusions are presented back to you, you reject them. Good work!we’re obviously blind to your double standards 😇🙌🏼🫡👌🏽

[truthscan @truthscan]

@CanuckDutch @megbasham Excellent. So you’ll have no issue posting the other equally inerrant and authoritative texts where monogamy is taught as being the principal basis/ model for marriage…yes?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@CanuckDutch @megbasham Curt, it’s always encouraging to see people affirm the actual historicity of the Bible and the fact that its meaning through translation has not been lost but been meticulously preserved over time. 🙏🏽

[truthscan @truthscan]

@ESchrade41275 @megbasham Ed, love does not rejoice with unrighteousness. Ergo, if said neighbour is engaging in unrighteous, love does not rejoice. What do you rejoice in?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@freedominnwnow @conservmillen The price of his sin was borne by Christ on the cross. God’s Justice was satisfied by the death of Christ (1 Jn 2:2). There is therefore no condemnation for those who are in Christ (Rom 8:1). That’s what would’ve happened

[truthscan @truthscan]

@k_mahlburg Great analysis. Perhaps it’s a good thing that they’re in decline. Judgment begins in God’s house. He is cleaning the rot.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@k_mahlburg Left has captured media and education. These are the battlegrounds. If you’re blind to who the enemy is, you’re their lunch.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@musk_news13 Yep

[truthscan @truthscan]

@gavinortlund Dear @gavinortlund, you miss @aigkenham’s point. Just because someone deals with the text doesn’t mean they are starting “inside” scripture. The moment they start to interpret the text with their own “logic” is when they start “outside” scripture.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@RealJamesWoods Hey Google! What do you mean by “men”?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@stangsimpleton @MastersSeminary But obviously, @stangsimpleton … you’re right about Calvin and John and Luther … is that correct?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@Cartroo @petrmares2 @KonstantinKisin Andy, thanks for being honest that you’re expecting others to agree with your subjective opinions and preferences ie morality by majority. Nothing wrong with that … said every authoritarian ever.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@dylanfandan @aigkenham The Apostolic Witness in person was available back then. It’s not available today. This is not about sequence of reporting … it’s about the source of truth. How Is this confusing for you?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@PatFanelli @aigkenham @JoeyMcLane1 False equivalence. ESPN is fallible. The Bible is not.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@aigkenham To everyone on this thread who’s got a problem with the critique from @aigkenham … if you don’t believe the resurrection because of The Bible, on what basis do you believe in the resurrection? Is your basis BETTER than The Bible?

[truthscan @truthscan]

@seanfeucht If you can’t differentiate between Samson, David, Peter … and the individuals JMac mentions, you’re part of the problem … as are the many here who agree with you … no wonder you’re pushing back. Nothing wrong dividing truth from error. Nothing absurd. You’re doing it yourself

[truthscan @truthscan]

@aigkenham @JoshElsom Dr Ham ... that was beautifully put 🙏🏽

[truthscan @truthscan]

@NeilShenvi @bekahmason @JackieHillPerry @kkdumez @NeilShenvi thanks for posting this in black and white. It’s hard not to conclude from this that essential doctrines like the existence of hell and substitutionary atonement are actually being denied by people who claim to love Christ. Very telling.

[truthscan @truthscan]

@JoshDaws Looks like many American Evangelicals have forgotten that our war is not against flesh and blood. Maybe that’s why they go to great lengths to point out the difference between Patriotism and Nationalism. As if the enemy really cares about semantics. Oh wait …