🚨ARTICLE: The Shadow Cabinet of Soros🚨
This is the story of National Security Action, a secretive Soros NGO.
Ten days after Trump's inauguration, a former Pentagon official publicly floated a military coup in Foreign Policy magazine. Within a year, she was advising a new Soros-funded organization that quietly assembled 70 former Obama national security officials under one roof.
46 of them went on to staff the Biden administration -- including the Secretary of State, CIA Director, DNI, NSA, and UN Ambassador. 88.6% were Obama alumni. The primary funder: the Open Society Action Fund.
The same woman simultaneously sat on the funder's board and the organization's advisory council. She also co-founded the Transition Integrity Project and spent 14 years at New America developing doctrine on military refusal of orders.
Read it here.
"Reese really jumped in uninvited 😭💀
Sophie Cunningham drops one celebration pose and it becomes the most viral WNBA moment of the season… then Angel Reese shows up in the replies like she built the league single-handedly. Even Kevin Durant had to speak on it.
Is this the pettiest WNBA beef or the most hilarious reality check? 👀"
HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?
Newsom and Bonta just pulled the same dirty trick.
Newsom signed AB181 to strip power from the Superintendent. Bonta manipulated the ballot title on Voter ID.
If they can’t beat you honestly, they rig the outcome. Let's show them California belongs to voters, not politicians.
🚨 BREAKING: Attorney General Rob Bonta Just RIGGED and MANIPULATED the Voter ID Initiative on the November Ballot
Rob Bonta changed the official language of the Voter ID initiative (Prop 39) in the middle of the election season. This language had been approved for over a year, and millions of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents signed petitions to support it.
Original Language (Approved for over a year): “ESTABLISHES ADDITIONAL VOTER IDENTIFICATION AND CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.”
It would require government-issued ID at the polls or the last four digits when voting by mail, provide free voter ID cards, and require annual citizenship verification reports by county.
New Language (Changed by Bonta): “PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.”
It now invalidates mail ballots without the last four digits on the envelope and prohibits in-person voting without ID.
Time we demand
What a SCAM
So California is losing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from people buying electric cars and not needing SMOG checks anymore
So the state is considering a new program called VSSI checks, Vehicle Safety Systems Inspection checks to be mandatory to make up for the money they are losing
This is what’s being talked about in the community of people who own SMOG check businesses, these are the whispers of what’s coming
The Vehicle Safety Systems Inspection was launched by the Bureau of Automotive Repair in 2021
Right now it’s not for all vehicles, it’s primarily required for salvage, rebuilt and reconstructed vehicles before DMV registration
It goes over things like brakes, lights, steering, suspension, tires, body structure, etc.
So the rumors are that Democrats are thinking about making this be the new mandatory check that will replace their SMOG revenue
California Democrats need to be removed. They keep doing insane things and you can’t vote them out of office because we all know they rig the elections
This check is what will likely be used later on to check your mileage for the mileage tax. I bet it’s all connected
🚨 BREAKING: Attorney General Rob Bonta Just RIGGED and MANIPULATED the Voter ID Initiative on the November Ballot
Rob Bonta changed the official language of the Voter ID initiative (Prop 39) in the middle of the election season. This language had been approved for over a year, and millions of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents signed petitions to support it.
Original Language (Approved for over a year): “ESTABLISHES ADDITIONAL VOTER IDENTIFICATION AND CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.”
It would require government-issued ID at the polls or the last four digits when voting by mail, provide free voter ID cards, and require annual citizenship verification reports by county.
New Language (Changed by Bonta): “PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.”
It now invalidates mail ballots without the last four digits on the envelope and prohibits in-person voting without ID.
This is blatant manipulation and rigging right in the middle of the election season. We need your help to fight back and save California.
Share this, sign up to volunteer, and comment FIGHT below if you’re in this battle with us ⬇️
My Remarks @PressClubDC National Press Club First Amendment Discussion
“On Monday, I wrote my first check to the US District Court for the $800 dollar daily contempt fine. The plaintiff is now asking the court to increase the fines to $5000 dollars a day, and bar third-party reimbursements for the fines. This is designed to break a journalist — mentally, emotionally and financially.”
“It should also concern every journalist — and every American who values a free press — that vital First Amendment rights are being decided in a case where the courts have kept important evidence secret from the public by keeping documents under seal.”
“Serious journalists everywhere should demand the release of this sealed evidence so the public can fully understand what is truly at stake when courts impose fines and order reporters to reveal their sources.”
“At a time when many corporate media outlets choose to settle or pressure journalists to surrender their notes, I want to acknowledge that Fox News has continued to stand behind me and fully support the First Amendment and investigative journalism by paying my attorney’s fees — even though I left the network seven years ago.”