AgentOS

The AI foundation for your business. Your context, tools and skills in one place, shared with every agent you use. Free to start.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

Your team uses Claude, Chatgpt and Cursor. None of them know what the others know.

AgentOS gives every AI tool the same company context, the same access rules, and the same way of doing the job.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

running a team is mostly asking "did anyone get back to them?" and waiting to find out. it doesn't have to be that hard.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

"did anyone get back to them?" "is thursday still on?" "who's got the new one?"

you shouldn't even have to ask. use agentOS instead!

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

you explained the client to chatgpt on monday. to claude on tuesday. to the new hire on wednesday.

next time, just say it once.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@businessbarista deciding what an agent is allowed to see usually has no owner. legal thinks it’s IT, IT thinks it’s the team asking. that question alone can stall a pilot for a quarter

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@rampsarathy this goes past the CRM too. most teams have claude, chatgpt and cursor all rebuilding the same picture from scratch, and they don’t always agree

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

if your teammate needs all 4, so does your AI agent.

that's what agentos keeps in one place. https://t.co/oT53cx4H43

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

before you hand a client to a teammate, they need 4 things: 👇

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

> where the files actually live.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@hot_town the “which one will the agent actually use well” framing is the right one. for us MCP has been the simplest way to let chatgpt and claude reach the same company context

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@0xwhrrari same thing we see at the team level. the model’s usually fine. what’s missing is the context around it: who the client is, what was already tried, what was promised

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@coreyganim the hard part of a company brain isn’t building it, it’s keeping it current. the context changes every day, and every AI tool on the team needs the same version of it

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@manthanguptaa memory gets interesting at work. grok remembers, chatgpt remembers, claude remembers, and none of them remember the same thing about your company

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@KSimback agree with a lot of this. the half your AI doesn’t cover is the boring part: keeping that document repo current, and making sure chatgpt, claude and your agents all read the same version of it

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

@ConnorGillivan the client names and in-house jargon part is the real problem. typing faster helps, but the bigger win is never having to type that context again. it should live somewhere every tool can already read

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

every AI chat at work starts with the same paragraph. who the client is, what we already sent, what they asked last time.

your team has typed that paragraph more times than any email.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

the second follow-up depends on what the first one said.

that’s why AI-written follow-ups sound so generic. the tool never saw the first email, the call notes, or what the person actually asked.

[AgentOS @try_agentos]

Paste #14 this week. 👻

New AI chat, same backstory. Who the client is, the tone, what happened last week.

AgentOS connects your email, chat and files once, so every AI tool your team uses (ChatGPT and Claude too) starts from the same company info.