In 1999 climbers found George Mallory's body high on Everest, 75 years after he vanished, and the clothes he died in were still on him. They were wool, silk and cotton. In 2006 somebody put on an exact copy and climbed the mountain in it.
For decades the story had been that Mallory and Irvine were doomed by their kit. Tweed jackets and woolly jumpers at 28,000 feet. Brave amateurs, dressed for a grouse moor.
The body told a different story. Mallory was wearing 8 thin layers. Silk next to the skin, then fine wool, then more silk, more wool, a flannel shirt, and a windproof cotton outer woven so tightly it turned the snow.
Four British universities took fragments from the body and rebuilt the whole outfit, thread for thread. A mountaineer called Graham Hoyland wore it on Everest.
He reported that it was warm. It was also lighter than the modern down suit his companions were wearing. The silk layers slid over the wool, so he could move his arms freely, which a man in a padded plastic suit cannot. The wool held its warmth when damp with sweat. He said he would have been comfortable going for the summit in it.
The researchers concluded the clothing was fully up to the job.
So the gear of 1924 was not the weak point. A sheep and a silkworm had solved the problem of the coldest place on earth, at less weight, before anyone had invented nylon.
Then we spent a century replacing it with petroleum and told ourselves the men who came before were underdressed.
An update to the @airbnb mess from a couple weeks ago - because it's just been a massive failure on the part of @AirbnbHelp despite breaches of @AirbnbPolicy.
We were in a small nearly all glass apartment in Buzios, Brazil. It became known to us that our host was monitoring us through security cameras in the condo complex.
We found this out as the host sent us a photo of our dog off leash (he snuck out the front door for 30seconds when we were cleaning). The host tried to fine us for having our dog off leash on the property.
First of all, for them to have noticed 30 seconds in 2 weeks proves they were monitoring us. Second of all, the camera it was taken from was an undisclosed security camera (which breaks the terms and conditions of Airbnb and Brazilian law).
We filed a complaint with AirBnb.
Airbnb pretended to take it seriously, and then took the side of the host without asking us for any evidence of the cameras. Then, the support thread was closed.
I would open a new thread stating, "I'd like to provide evidence that the host is monitoring us and breaking terms and conditions, AND Brazilian law." To which AirBnb (or their AI bots) would again say something along the lines of "We reviewed the case, though the cameras are undisclosed, the cameras belong to the condo and not the host, therefore though they break our terms, there's nothing we can do about it.
Now, obviously, when selling the AirBnb the host includes the swimming pool, gym, BBQ area, etc. of the condo complex. So, if those areas do not belong to the host, how are they allowed to be in the listing. If they're included in the listing, are they also not protected under the terms of AirBnb?
And whether or not they are is beside the point, and irrelevant.
The following day, I looked around our apartment for other cameras. I found 4-5 other cameras. Some of these cameras were pointing directly at our all windowed apartment. I'm sure that they would be able to see inside our apartment.
I opened more threads on Airbnb support.
I wanted to offer evidence, photos, and proof that there were more cameras present.
AirBnb didn't want evidence. They already gathered evidence from the host.
Imagine, a world where the victim isn't allowed to provide evidence:
"Someone broke into my house, officer!"
"Sorry, we have already talked to the burglur. They said they didn't do it."
"Sir, I have evidence."
"Sorry, the accused already denied it. So we don't need evidence."
"I literally have photos of the crime."
"This case has been closed as the accused has stated they didn't do it."
I decided to let it go as finally an AirBnb support member assured me they were going to take things seriously, and they would get back to me. They told me quite honestly that the case was "complicated" since the cameras weren't owned directly by the host and they offered to refund us a couple nights of the stay so we could leave early and move to a hotel.
However, I didn't care about any of that. I didn't want to get something out of AirBnb. All I wanted was a message from the AirBnb staff stating something simple like:
"We have talked to the host. They agreed that in the future they will put a note in their listing that there are security cameras on the condo property and you may be monitored while on the condo grounds. Also, can you please send us some photos of the cameras that you found that are looking into your apartment so we can notify the host of their presence so she can request them moved?"
But no, none of that.
In fact, Airbnb support just continued to dodge me, never requested evidence, and continuously closed threads.
It has been nearly a month since the incident, and still to this day, AirBnb has not once asked me for evidence. Nor have they provided me a promise that they have asked this host to make the required changes to follow their terms and conditions.
I personally stay in hotel or hosted accommodation about 200 days a year. Between my 2 travel companies, I also book about 700-800 rooms a year. Since AirBnb has refused to prove to me that they care even a little bit about the experience, privacy, and safety of guests, I'll be cutting AirBnb from any of my bookings moving forward - unless a proper response finally comes of this.
It is an unbelievable scenario when a guest can say, "I feel like the host is violating my personal privacy". And AirBnb's response is, "We talked to the host and they said they're not. The matter is concluded".
It's an even grater failure in responsibility when even AirBnb agrees that the terms and conditions have been violated, but they can't take action. It proves that their legally binding terms and conditions mean nothing.
The terms and conditions are there to protect only the host and the company. The guests do not care. That's the message, use it as you may.
@Will_Tanner_1 Well, that's the thing. It works for one person or a couple, but not for a family with a bunch of kids. I wonder if this is an attempt to bring us back to the longhouse.
@Gonzohall It depends on the change and, as you said, whether the balance is maintained. Unfortunately, it isn't. Housing prices keep rising while the local income levels aren't keeping pace.