@SpeechUnion All leftist governments around the world want to ban X ! Thats Crystal clear.
Apparently Blusky (the devils den) is an acceptable platform.
@DrewPavlou Omg! It was just a fun thing and the world loved it!
Now to change the subject, how about that Odyssey movie (nothing to do with Norway) Anyone going to watch it?
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
@catturd2 I watched an episode where they talked about TC running for President. There is a plan and they are part of it.
So many of these podcasters make millions “pretending” ? To be conservatives and have turned against the Republican Party.
Very odd.
The latest GCN new letter today “A group of 13 psychiatrists claims that “punitive action” by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) against critics of the puberty blocker-driven, gender-affirming treatment model is “unprecedented”.
I started Patriot Caps because I wanted Australians to have a cap worth wearing.
I'm Michael — Afghan veteran, current firefighter. Premium quality, designs that mean something, and a cause behind every purchase.
5% of every sale goes to Swiss 8, supporting Australian veterans.
The abuse women encounter for wanting women only spaces is from the worst of men who demand access to women only spaces.
When ABC’s media watch contacted me a few weeks ago, they asked this:
“The ABC argues that by publishing an inaccurate and misleading item, harm could result, to a vulnerable group. What is your response to this?”
I responded with this:
“Men who claim to be women are not vulnerable. They are the most powerful group in the country. Don’t believe me? “Misgender” or say no to one of them and see who has the upper hand. Hint: it isn’t you.
This “vulnerable” group has the Australian Human Rights Commission and the government on their side. Women who want woman only spaces on the basis of sex don’t have that. Who is more vulnerable?
To say that men who claim to be women are vulnerable is an inaccuracy I would seek to challenge at the ABC. Would the ABC publish an op-ed by me explaining that men who claim to be women aren’t vulnerable? What does it say about the ABC if they wouldn’t?
I trust you can see what I’m getting at.
—
MediaWatch didn’t repeat this 👆
Always remember, every claim gender ideology makes, the exact opposite is true.
“We have a Labour government stating plainly that it intends to intervene directly in the content people consume. Its war on X heralds an assault on people’s freedom of speech and of thought,” writes Ada Akpala.
It appears that the Government and Labour MPs’ war against Elon Musk’s free speech platform, X, is hotting up.
Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, has quit X because she believes the increase in abuse and “misinformation” is unhealthy for democracy. The minister literally responsible for the media has decided to vacate the stage rather than engage in debate and tackle misinformation.
Lucy Powell, Labour’s deputy leader, has branded the platform “toxic” and is spearheading plans to effectively censor open political debate on social media platforms such as X during election periods.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan has repeatedly attacked X for spreading “misinformation” about the state of London. He has also welcomed an Ofcom investigation into sexualised images on the platform and accused X owner Elon Musk of misunderstanding free speech.
Now that Labour ministers and NGOs have X in their sights, will they seek to ban the platform?
Read more below in @spikedonline 👇