@JusthereCO@ostrachan Protecting women from algorithms specifically made for her own insecurities, fears, and weaknesses is not treating someone like a child.
Just like I wouldn’t permit my wife to jog on the highway.
It has nothing to do with her being spirit filled.
It’s that is foolish.
@Sam_l0ve@ostrachan If I approve of them.
Like just about everybody, there are friends that just aren’t in the circle anymore. Bad influence and all that.
You wouldn’t make the cut.
@vital0gy@ostrachan Law? Now how’s operating on fear?
It’s not about law.
It’s about not neglecting the wife God gave you to cherish and protect, and present to Him one day.
@ostrachan If women had a habit of wanting to play hopscotch on the highway, should we forbid this? Would that be controlling?
Is that the patriarchal bogeyman?
Is that failing to trust a spirit-filled wife?
This is why complementarianism doesn’t work - the man has no actual authority.
@JusthereCO@ostrachan You know the biggest supporter of Muslims in this country?
It’s women.
Chalk another point up for those of us who believe women need godly leadership.
@vital0gy@ostrachan We’re not talking about violent crime.
We are talking about women being the weaker vessels, and more easily mislead, like their mother Eve.
Godly women actually desire to be protected from their own weaknesses.
Good men actually protect.
This isn’t rocket science.
@thejohndavis@ostrachan Thinking that 1 million Christian men’s families wouldn’t be better off if they limited their wife’s social media is incredibly dimwitted.
@thejohndavis@ostrachan Single digit iq take.
It’s not about fear, or control. You’re projecting.
It actually acknowledging that women are indeed weaker vessels and are not designed to be out from under the protective authority of a husband or father.
Some men can’t comprehend actual leadership.
@SlowToWrite Imagine watching the Lindsey Clancy trial, and how that played out in society for the last month and thinking that Brian is way off base here.
Complementarianism is so cooked.