@Thienthien1305 Bài viết bịa nhiều lổ hổng: 1. Ko biết đc sdt, 2. App luôn nhắc kiểm tra kĩ số dư qua app 3. Bị báo vẫn khiếu nại tranh chấp liền được 4. Thông tin thương mới cũ biết để cẩn thận …
Chi phí AI cao hơn lương nhân viên cơ bản ở nước ngoài, nghĩa là rất cao sao với lương mức VN.
Cân nhắc chi phí chứ ko thể chém gió, đến Coinbase mới 4 tháng mà AI đã ăn hết ngân quỹ hoạt động 2026.
https://t.co/GBDiaX9l4m
Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw “confirm before acting” and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.
Lời nhắn nhủ cho những người thủ cụ: chúng tôi chưa to lớn nhưng chúng tôi bền bỉ và không bị vướng bận thì bạn ko thể đánh chìm chúng tôi theo cái cách xưa cũ đâu
Góc chém gió đầu tuần,
Sóng gió phải thế chứ. Bitcoin đâu phải là vật lí mà thuyền đắm là mất tất cả.
Thuyền Titanic là biểu tượng ko thể chìm trên Đại dương nhưng thực tế thì …
Dear Senator Warren,
Well THIS is fascinating. You're demanding that $40 billion back from Argentina while you're SIMULTANEOUSLY proposing we spend $90 billion on your "emergency lifeline" for seniors? Let's do some basic math here – your proposal costs more than twice what's supporting Argentina's currency stabilization. And here's what really gets me: Argentina is actually expected to pay that money back. Your "emergency spending" that just happens to roll out right before midterm elections though? That's totally different from strategic foreign policy investments, right?[1]
I need to break down what's really happening with Argentina since you seem to have missed several important details while you were busy crafting your TOTALLY NOT POLITICAL emergency proposal. The Argentine support involves a $20 billion currency swap – which is structured as a LOAN that will be repaid – plus another $20 billion from private sector sources. Banks and sovereign wealth funds, NOT taxpayer money.[2]
Meanwhile your "emergency" bill costs approximately $90 billion in DIRECT taxpayer funds and here's the best part: it would actually advance Social Security's trust fund insolvency dates by about two months.[3] You're literally proposing to make Social Security run out of money faster just to score political points. Absolutely brilliant strategy there, Liz!
Speaking of Trump's economy (the one you keep blaming for rising costs), maybe we should discuss what actually happened under different administrations? Trump's first term had record low unemployment at 3.5%. That included the LOWEST BLACK UNEMPLOYMENT RATES ON RECORD at 5.4%. Over $1 trillion in new domestic investments. Inflation was manageable.[4] Then Biden took office and suddenly – BAM – groceries, housing, energy costs all SKYROCKETED under HIS policies. Not Trump's.
But your argument gets particularly rich here (unlike most seniors you claim to care about): You're personally worth over $12 million,[5] yet you're out here lecturing everyone about how hard seniors have it affording things. You consistently vote to defend SNAP in continuing resolutions while simultaneously complaining about healthcare costs rising. YOU CONTROL THE PURSE, Senator! There's a no-strings-attached CLEAN CR available right now! YOU can end the government funding standoff today and still come out ahead because Republicans are gaining absolutely nothing from this clean CR!
Instead you're demanding to extend temporary COVID relief at a cost of nearly $20,000 per taxpayer! Your excuse that people will pay more for their Obamacare is both telling and laughable. You're basically saying Obamacare is really expensive without COVID relief, while at the same time arguing that when the relief ends, prices will go up.
Would you seriously go to your boss and say this: "Last month you gave me a $1,000 Christmas bonus, so this month you cut my pay by $1,000 – do you not have a heart? You're taking money away from my family by not giving me the same extra $1,000 you did last month!" That's essentially your argument here.
Jim Quinn's Law #15 fits perfectly: "THE MORE THE GOVERNMENT SPENDS, THE RICHER THE POLITICIAN BECOMES." Funny how your "emergency lifeline" appears right when you need to rally senior voters before an election. Just a wild coincidence I'm sure.
And about Argentina's "universal healthcare" that you mentioned – you mean the healthcare system that's currently collapsing under the economic crisis that prompted the US support in the first place? The same system where hospitals are running out of basic supplies and doctors are fleeing the country? THAT universal healthcare? Maybe research your talking points before using failing socialist systems as your shining examples.
What really burns me about your post is this: You're using seniors as political pawns while making Social Security's problems worse with your "solution." The program is already facing insolvency, and your answer is to speed that up by two months while spending $90 billion we don't have? That's not compassion. That's political opportunism dressed up in a grandma's sweater.
You want to help seniors? How about NOT accelerating Social Security's collapse? How about passing the clean CR and ending the shutdown you're prolonging? How about questioning why the Biden administration let inflation rage out of control instead of blaming Trump for problems that developed under different leadership?
That would require actually solving problems instead of creating sound bites for your next campaign though. And we both know which one you prefer.
Here's Quinn's Law #7 for you: "THE MORE ARTICULATE THE POLITICIAN, THE LESS KNOWLEDGEABLE." Your eloquent posts about helping seniors would be way more convincing if your actual policies didn't make their situations worse.
[1] Popular Information, "UPDATE: Taxpayer bailout of Argentina may grow to $40 billion," October 2025
[2] NBC News, "U.S. support for Argentina could hit $40 billion," October 2025
[3] CNBC, "Senate Democrats propose increasing VA, Social Security benefits by $200 a month for six months," October 2025
[4] Comprehensive list of Trump accomplishments, project documents
[5] Public records of congressional net worth
#SocialSecuritySolvency #DoTheMath #PoliticalOpportunism #QuinnsLaws #CleanCR #ActualFiscalResponsibility #StopPlayingPolitics #ArgentinaFacts #EmergencyMyFoot #SeniorsDeserveBetter
@zxstim@rstormsf Mỹ có toà có luật lệ đầy đủ. Cãi ngang thì chịu. Giống XRP ko là chứng khoán nhưng chào bán thì là chứng khoán. Chứng khoán nhưng hợp đồng tương lai là hàng hoá …