@TheosBarham11 Men choose the women who get into relationships, a ring and Finally marriage. On the other hand, women choose which man gets sex and also which man gets to be called daddy.. Everyone must suffer the consequences of their actions man or woman as it should be. Get it?
Time rewards those who refuse to abandon their WHY.
Be patient with the process. Resilient through the storms. And when the journey becomes heavy, revisit the reason you began.
Change the strategy. Adjust the pace. But do not surrender the purpose.
Time eventually separates commitment from excitement.
Stay the course.
Madam, what you are describing is prostitution with better public relations. The only difference is that you have replaced an hourly rate with a lifestyle requirement and called the arrangement โdatingโ.
And then, with astonishing confidence, you declare that only poor men will be triggered.
No. A man does not have to be unable to afford something to recognise that it has been priced.
If his bank balance determines whether he deserves access to you, why should he not ask what you bring that another woman cannot?
Beauty? There is always someone more beautiful.
Youth? Time is undefeated.
Sex? Desire alone has never sustained a civilisation, much less a marriage.
Status? Fortunes and reputations change.
The things that make a woman difficult to replace are rarely the things money can buy: character, wisdom, loyalty, peace, discernment, the ability to build with a man when the seasons change.
The poor man you ridicule may one day acquire money. But if money is the only language through which you recognise the worth of a man, no amount of money will cure your own poverty.
Akuume.
Iโll respond with Ephesians 6:1โ4, especially verse 4.
Scripture says: โChildren, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. โHonor your father and motherโโwhich is the first commandment with a promiseโthat it may go well with you and that you may enjoy long life on the earth.โ But it immediately goes on to say: โFathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord.โ
The instruction is not one-sided.
Yes, children are commanded to honour their parents. But fathers also have a responsibility toward their children. Being someoneโs father does not permanently remove a person from accountability. Age, position and parenthood do not make anyone infallible.
If a father makes decisions his children genuinely believe are deeply wrong, harmful or contrary to their familyโs interests, they are not required to suppress every objection simply because he is their father. Respect does not mean unquestioning submission, and disagreement is not automatically disrespect.
What troubles me is how quickly people are demanding an apology from the son while showing far less interest in what brought him to the point of speaking that way. We cannot condemn the reaction while deliberately refusing to examine the conduct that produced it.
The Tooro succession dispute is exposing uncomfortable questions about power, family, tradition and loyalty. Tradition deserves respect, but it does not deserve immunity from scrutiny. Elders deserve dignity, but they can still be wrong. And fathers, too, can exasperate their children.
So before asking, โHow could a son speak about his father that way?โ perhaps we should ask the more uncomfortable question:
What happened that made the son feel he had to?
One day we must have serious conversations about how gay lifestyle is largely economic driven as opposed to being an actual sexual orientation.
A lot of these "gays" even identify as bisexual because they still want to enjoy the deliciousness of vagana without losing the economic benefits of being bent over by richer men.
That's what I observed in SA.
In the book of MALACHI 3:10 the Bible says
"I will pour out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it." May this be your story today!