Youβre nitpicking. What I just watched was actually hilarious for me, because, youβre claiming that this resident left Don Lemon βspeechless,β however he continued to respond with the facts and inquiry further into the residentβs beliefs. Not once was he speechless. The most funny thing is not only was he not speechless, but in terms of debating, he kicked that residentβs a$$. The resident in question was honestly the one speechless, because he just kept repeating the same Fox News buzz words and propaganda that heβs heard from the bizarrely biased media yβall push.
Here are the facts:
1) Whenever a person crosses the border illegally, they are charged with a CIVIL crime. Nothing about crossing the border illegally is criminal. Donβs point in bringing up the presidentβs 34 felonies was to help the resident weigh the difference between civil and criminal. Donald J. Trump, the sitting president of the United States is a criminal. People who cross the border illegally are not. That is the key difference here to recognize.
2) Don Lemon repeatedly stated and agreed with the resident on the fact that illegal immigrants who commit crimes beyond the border crossing should be deported. The majority of people agree with thatβthat Iβm aware of at leastβ¦ Don, however, was suggesting an alternative for illegal immigrants who are not here to commit crime. In example, an illegal immigrant seeking refuge should be provided the maximum amount of support available to help them stay safe, get set up for citizenship while still living in the country, and also be provided basic human necessities as applicable. That is not irrational. However, something many conservatives tend to do in response to alternativesβespecially MAGAβis they like to completely dismiss the idea. Usually not considering any of the points. Which is ironic, because it actively implies that all of yβall are close-minded.
But, thatβs fine. Yβall do yβall. Just know that nearly every argument you make is contradictory, inconsiderate, or misses crucial responses to counter-claims.
They can detain her if she is within 100 miles of the border, otherwise, they cannot. However, she does have the legal right to remain silent. Sheβs not required to answer, itβll just prolong how long it takes for her to be allowed through the check point and she could possibly be arrested. Obviously, the officers need reason to suspect she committed a crime. But, Iβm not sure that refusing to provide citizenship status, outside of that 100 mile radius, if thatβs where this is, is reasonable grounds to suspect her of a crime. I mean, maybe? But, I think it would make more sense to look for more signs, because, unless sheβs trafficking someone, has drugs, illegal substances, or guns, then I donβt totally think going off of just her refusal to provide citizenship is enough. Within the 100 mile radius makes more sense to have probable cause, but itβs still iffy until you start getting pretty close to the border.
This is actually real!
The Walk signal in Denver was hacked to announce, βF-ck Trump. Trump murders children.β
This should be everywhere in America.
When I listen to pastor Hegseth and his religious crusade talk, this clip featuring Bek Lover frequently springs to mind, because the level of ignorance when it comes to religious tribalism is so amusing to me.
Everybodyβs God is always on their side, but we never seem to hear that from God himself. How convenient.
π₯ TikTok - https://t.co/9wKItxbCnT
The President of the United States said I insulted Jesus.
You want to know what insults Jesus?
Kicking the sick off their healthcare.
Bombing schoolchildren in Iran.
Deporting moms and babies.
Covering up the Epstein files.
Yes Mr President, they look like a totally broken nation.
If Iβm not mistaken sir, more people turned out to bury Iranβs Supreme leader and civilians you killed, than showed up for your first inauguration.
Are you winning yet?
π₯ TikTok https://t.co/PhOflofHyy