@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 Muhammed SAW died 632CE, codex mashhad could've been written at 670CE, no idea what ur on about. Muhammed SAW never quotes anyone, Muhammed only revealed the words of Allah. And no i fucking didn't bring up the quran you did.
@Phoenizius_@trevi39733 Why are you still trying? Stop replying, you only embarrass yourself more, you tried like 5 times already. It's not scientifically incorrect and I've explained what it means, just shut up already ur making urself look pathetic.
@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 LOLL
so now you have to switch from hadith to Qur'an, ur argument still doesn't work. We have Codex Mashhad which has over 90% of the Quran along with various other codexes, and codex mashhad was only ~70 years after Muhammed SAW died. We have manuscripts from when he lived too🤡
@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 We have access to hadiths COMPILED 100 years ago. You don't. You only have access to codex sinaticis which came 350 years after.
@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 Oh and can we see those gospels from the fourth decade? No? I guess it's just a game of telephone and trust me bros then. You have zero proof the bible you have today is what was written back in the fourth decade. P.S they were written 70-100 years after jesus died anyways lol
@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 Dude are you dumb lol? The oldest bible you have today is codex sinaticus. Which was written 350 years after jesus 😭😭😭😭 if you're rejecting hadith then you have to throw your bible in the trash and set it on fire. Isnad is not just a "game of telephone" it's more complex.
@falseprofitmo@Ahraz__@kmach1 Nope. Hadith can be traced back directly to Muhammed SAW via the isnad. Hadiths were written when Muhammed SAW was alive (Ali ibn Abi Talib, Anas ibn Malik, Abdulah ibn Amr al-Aas) or shortly after he died. Hadith compilations were 1-200 years later. Much more credible than bible