Reflexive operators (term coined by @Fionnindy) bring to speech the very moment of coming into speech. *By itself* this moment is nothing, or it is withdrawal. A reflexive operator brings to the fore the withdrawal that speech and thought are.
Often we assume we know what a concept means without being familiar with the questions and problems that the concept functions as an answer to, ie. the whole discourse in which a given concept plays a role.
Philosophy is the most ordinary, because it is thinking, not one of the things we may think. Philosophy is the most extraordinary, because it *alone* is this.
Self-consciousness cannot be understood as originating through the connection of independent and separate representations together, because this very act of unifying presupposes the original simple unity of apperception.
There's a deep dialectic in the idea of Christian repentance. Namely: even the way one repents is to be repented. This continual renewal is the true repentance that has no end.
If thinking is interpreted as merely one of the things we might think of, then it appears that the only way to think of the absolute is to think of it as The Other to the norms of thinking (Meillassoux's "hyperchaos").