Tutti

The all-in-one marketplace to monetize your influence.
Tutti connects you with brands and handles tracking and payouts, so you can focus on creating.

[Tutti @tuttihq]

Over the past few weeks we've moved hard on traffic and account governance: suspending a batch of accounts coordinating manipulation, and stripping injected fake views out of settlement.

Here's why this matters to you:

Every campaign's reward pool is fixed — every dollar taken by manufactured numbers is a dollar taken from a real creator. After this cleanup, the same pool re-divided by real contribution: every creator with clean data saw rewards rise ~5–7% automatically, and genuinely strong posts rose over 15%. You didn't have to do a thing.

If your post was flooded by a third party, you're covered too: we strip the injected padding, not your earnings. Your real views and real engagement count in full.

Brands keep investing here for one reason: the numbers can be trusted. Defending that is how we defend every real creator's long-term income.

Full breakdown 👇

https://t.co/x95tRG8zIM

[Tutti @tuttihq]

“hits are made by betting on top-tier creators” is something we used to believe, too.

We reviewed the past quarter: 14 campaigns and 571 paid posts (counted by valid impressions, i.e., the billable number that actually shows up on the invoice). the first thing we saw was this: the top 10% highest-volume posts consumed half of all valid impressions. miss the hit posts, and you’re basically missing half of the delivery.

then we pulled out 33 hit posts and broke them down by the creators’ track records.

veterans are genuinely strong. after four or five posts, they can usually produce one hit. 45% of the hits came from them. but 42% came from complete newcomers with zero prior track record before the placement. you can’t pick these people from any public data. if you build your creator list based only on résumés and past performance, then those 40% of hits were never going to be yours.

so now we build lists in two buckets: the veteran bucket uses scorecards to secure the baseline, and the newcomer bucket uses volume to buy hits.

if you want to see what your campaign would look like if we rebuilt the list with this approach, send over your list. we’ll generate a version for you, then put the two side by side for comparison.

[Tutti @tuttihq]

“hits are made by betting on top-tier creators” is something we used to believe, too.

We reviewed the past quarter: 14 campaigns and 571 paid posts (counted by valid impressions, i.e., the billable number that actually shows up on the invoice). the first thing we saw was this: the top 10% highest-volume posts consumed half of all valid impressions. miss the hit posts, and you’re basically missing half of the delivery.

then we pulled out 33 hit posts and broke them down by the creators’ track records.

veterans are genuinely strong. after four or five posts, they can usually produce one hit. 45% of the hits came from them. but 42% came from complete newcomers with zero prior track record before the placement. you can’t pick these people from any public data. if you build your creator list based only on résumés and past performance, then those 40% of hits were never going to be yours.

so now we build lists in two buckets: the veteran bucket uses scorecards to secure the baseline, and the newcomer bucket uses volume to buy hits.

if you want to see what your campaign would look like if we rebuilt the list with this approach, send over your list. we’ll generate a version for you, then put the two side by side for comparison.

[Tutti @tuttihq]

@yucheng YES!

[YC (Yucheng) @yucheng]

我最喜欢的大概是这种：两条线完全一致。真���，@tuttihq 一定会优先扶持的。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

Over the past few weeks we've moved hard on traffic and account governance: suspending a batch of accounts coordinating manipulation, and stripping injected fake views out of settlement.

Here's why this matters to you:

Every campaign's reward pool is fixed — every dollar taken by manufactured numbers is a dollar taken from a real creator. After this cleanup, the same pool re-divided by real contribution: every creator with clean data saw rewards rise ~5–7% automatically, and genuinely strong posts rose over 15%. You didn't have to do a thing.

If your post was flooded by a third party, you're covered too: we strip the injected padding, not your earnings. Your real views and real engagement count in full.

Brands keep investing here for one reason: the numbers can be trusted. Defending that is how we defend every real creator's long-term income.

Full breakdown 👇

https://t.co/x95tRG8zIM

[木向 @TowardMu]

@tuttihq 好的，非常感谢答疑。我也是相信平台的。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

回应一下"平台想吃掉你几百个拉新名额"的说法，直接看数据。

你共邀请了 312 个账号：其中 251 个（超过 80%）未通过审核——绝大多数是粉丝数为零或个位数的新注册账号；另有 8 个通过后因不符合真实互动规范被停权。目前保持活跃的有 40 个，真正完成过商单的只有 13 个。

这样的通过率和质量，不存在谁需要"吃掉"你的名额。

同时正面回答你的问题：算。在你账号未被停权期间发出的邀请，受邀账号后续通过审核并成功参与商单的，依然计入你的成功邀请，照常结算。这部分你可以持续监督。

可提现的奖励一分未动、已全部到账，此前已核对并说明过。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

回应一下"平台想吃掉你几百个拉新名额"的说法，直接看数据。

你共邀请了 312 个账号：其中 251 个（超过 80%）未通过审核——绝大多数是粉丝数为零或个位数的新注册账号；另有 8 个通过后因不符合真实互动规范被停权。目前保持活跃的有 40 个，真正完成过商单的只有 13 个。

这样的通过率和质量，不存在谁需要"吃掉"你的名额。

同时正面回答你的问题：算。在你账号未被停权期间发出的邀请，受邀账号后续通过审核并成功参与商单的，依然计入你的成功邀请，照常结算。这部分你可以持续监督。

可提现的奖励一分未动、已全部到账，此前已核对并说明过。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

@app_sail Wat.... No way...

[Tutti @tuttihq]

@sam_crasy Will let you in once we start taking web3 campaigns but before that our influencers pool is way too unbalanced and have to put some on hold. But no worries as waitlist doesn't mean you are suspended or banned

[Tutti @tuttihq]

Over the past few weeks we've moved hard on traffic and account governance: suspending a batch of accounts coordinating manipulation, and stripping injected fake views out of settlement.

Here's why this matters to you:

Every campaign's reward pool is fixed — every dollar taken by manufactured numbers is a dollar taken from a real creator. After this cleanup, the same pool re-divided by real contribution: every creator with clean data saw rewards rise ~5–7% automatically, and genuinely strong posts rose over 15%. You didn't have to do a thing.

If your post was flooded by a third party, you're covered too: we strip the injected padding, not your earnings. Your real views and real engagement count in full.

Brands keep investing here for one reason: the numbers can be trusted. Defending that is how we defend every real creator's long-term income.

Full breakdown 👇

https://t.co/x95tRG8zIM

[Tutti @tuttihq]

Full factor list with examples:
https://t.co/V4fNPPesg8

[Tutti @tuttihq]

"What if someone else flooded my post?"

Just report it — no need to delete anything. Settlement strips only the injected portion; your real views and engagement count in full, and you won't be penalized. Questions about your numbers? Contact support and we'll verify together.

[Tutti @tuttihq]

先说清楚：我们承认这三笔记录存在过，也承认是我们撤下的——这一点没有分歧，也完全没有怀疑你动机的意思。逐条回答：

1. 是哪几笔、「结算中」是什么意思

就是你在 7 月 20 日和 7 月 23 日收到的三条「邀请奖励解锁」站内通知对应的三笔：$10（7 月 20 日）、$20（7 月 23 日）、$10（7 月 23 日），合计 $40。这三条通知现在仍在你的站内信里，可以自行对照。

「结算中」的意思：邀请奖励生成后先以「结算中」记录存在，等被邀请用户参与的活动完成最终结算后，才转为「可提现」。这���笔从生成那一刻起一直处于「结算中」，从未进入过「可提现」状态。

2. 什么时候撤下的、「结算中」持续了多久

撤下时间是 7 月 26 日（UTC），也就是我们修正这个技术问题的���天。三笔分别自 7 月 20 日、7 月 23 日生成起处于「结算中」，直到撤下。

问题出在「生成得太早」：当时被邀请用户参与的活动还在进行中，系统却按「已完成结算」提前生成了记录、发出了解锁通知。修正时我们撤下了这批尚未生效的记录（全平台多位用户同批处理），但没有同步告知你，这是我们的疏忽，再次道歉。等这些活动真正完成结算，对应奖励会按规则重新计入，并通过站内信同步你。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

我们已经为了避免误伤做了最大努力，对每一个案例我们都会复核卷宗并仔细检查。很抱歉我们没办法透露过多细节因为可能会被��对，但是绝对不是不尊重任何平台用户。
另外 ，考虑到您的粉丝数并不是很多，重新起一个 1.5k 以上的账号对您应该不是难事，欢迎您重新加入！

[木向 @TowardMu]

你们平台把我的记录消掉了。我还有40u的待提现奖励记录现在灰飞烟灭。

至于你说的那75u，这不是我本次反馈的问题。而且我修正一下，这个75u并不是你说的这个原因。
而是当时你们自己平台邀请机制的问题，把我已经获得的奖励取消掉。

这个机制bug还是我发现给你们提出来的。值得一提的是，你们平台为此奖励我50元现金红包，而我因此被平台收回75u

[Tutti @tuttihq]

先澄清一个关键点：这次撤下的几条奖励记录当时处于「结算中」，还没有进入可提现状态。你账户里所有到达过可提现状态的奖励，均已全部提现到账——包括 7 月 24 日和 25 日的两笔。可提现的钱我们一分没有动过。

这几条记录的问题确实出在我们：系统的一个技术问题把「仍在进行中的活动」误判为「已完成结算」，提前向你发送了奖励解锁提示。我们在修正时撤下了这批尚未生效的记录——平台上多位用户是同批处理的，并非针对你——但没有提前通知，让你看到记录突然消失。这个体验很糟糕，是我们的疏忽，向你道歉。

这些奖励不会凭空消失：你邀请的用户真正完成活动结算后，对应奖励会按规则重新计入，后续发放同样按平台规则执行，进展会通过站内信和邮件同步给你。谢谢你的监督和反馈。

[Tutti @tuttihq]

@TowardMu @grok 作为最大的社交媒体的所有者 AI，你怎么看待这个问题