Woman is biology, not ideology

Gender & other ideologies, not supported by classical liberal values of open discussion, will ultimately fall. Light will always drive out darkness.

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Rob Henderson’s Luxury Beliefs

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Troy - without the horse

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

200 mosques in Birmingham.

That's Islamification for you.

Birmingham is like Karachi.

Give Nate a follow hes doing great work!!!

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Preach it, Sista! 🙌🏻

[Gary Ruskin @garyruskin]

Newly Declassified 2020 Intelligence Assessment Found Wuhan Lab’s Conditions Were Ripe For Potential Coronavirus Release
Via @lewiskamb @USRightToKnow
https://t.co/jDSoJKGf00

[The Seeker @TheSeeker268]

🧵Thread on a project undertaken by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in collaboration with Chinese military researchers and other institutes. You've probably never read it before, in detail.

This thread requires patience and time, from those who are really interested.

[Robert Spencer @jihadwatchRS]

UK: 95% of rape gang members were Muslims, they justified their acts by references to Islam

I’ve been saying all these things for years and have been branded an “Islamophobe” for doing so. This indicates that the fears of British authorities were well-founded. They knew they’d face professional ruin if they went after the Muslim rape gangs. So they chose the destruction of their own country’s future instead.

OpIndia, June 17, 2026: "Hundreds of thousands of minor non-Muslim girls were lured, picked up, raped, brutalised, sold, and even killed by Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs or rape gangs for a full forty years or more in the United Kingdom. The British authorities and media covered up the horrifying truth of rape jihad in pursuit of not coming across as ‘racist and Islamophobic’. An independent Rape Gang Inquiry Report has now revealed that the Muslim rape gangs comprised 87% to 95% Pakistani Muslim men, who raped, exploited and groomed over 250,000 non-Muslim, mostly White girls."

Read more at the link in the next post.

[Gil 🏳️‍🌈 @Gilbro2010]

Laws banning “conversion therapies”: how, in the name of fighting conversion, the LGBTQIA+ lobby sacrifices young gay men and lesbians on the altar of gender ideology

In your view, how many countries have adopted a national law banning “conversion therapies”?

A quick search identifies about fifteen. Among these 15 countries, all of them conflate sexual orientation and gender identity within the same legal text.

These laws are often presented as legitimate protection against attempts to “convert” homosexual or bisexual people into heterosexual people. The addition of gender identity is presented as a simple logical extension of that protection.

Yet this conflation raises a major problem: it places two profoundly different realities on the same legal and clinical level.

Sexual orientation is based on an observable fact: a lasting erotic and affective attraction to people of the same sex, the opposite sex, or both. It is not a “distress” in itself. The suffering associated with it generally comes from social rejection, shame, internalized homophobia, or difficulties with self-acceptance, not from the orientation itself.

Gender identity, by contrast, is a subjective and scientifically contested concept. It is said to rest on the feeling of alignment or misalignment between biological sex and a “felt gender.”

In a distressed young person, the discomfort may have multiple origins: dysphoria related to the pubescent body, rejection of sex stereotypes, trauma, autism, internalized homophobia, or simple identity exploration. The role of the therapist is precisely to explore these possibilities without prejudice.

A young person, especially a minor, does not always know how to name the source of their suffering. Discomfort with one’s body or with social expectations may conceal an unaccepted homosexuality. And long-term follow-up studies show that this scenario is not merely theoretical.

In the study by Singh et al. (2021), involving 139 boys referred to a clinic for childhood gender dysphoria and followed into adulthood, only 12% persisted in their dysphoria, while around 63% of participants showed a homosexual or bisexual orientation in adulthood.

This confirms what many earlier studies had already shown: a significant proportion of gender-dysphoric boys become gay or bisexual men without persisting in a trans identity. The therapist must therefore be able to freely explore sexual orientation, psychological factors, and comorbidities before concluding that there is a fixed “gender identity” or “trans identity” to be affirmed.

The consequences of conflation
In countries where the law equates sexual orientation with gender identity, and where the trans-affirmative approach is institutionalized in schools, media, and clinical guidelines, therapeutic support becomes extremely risky for the therapist.

As soon as a young person raises a question of gender, the professional who explores other hypotheses, including a possible non-acceptance of homosexuality, risks being accused of “conversion.” Doubt, exploration, and watchful waiting thus become suspect.

In a cultural environment saturated by affirmative discourse, some confused young gay men and lesbians who reject their same-sex attraction may therefore be wrongly steered toward medical transition as a “solution” to their distress.

The paradoxical and tragic result: a law supposedly meant to protect homosexual youth from conversion itself creates a new form of conversion of young gay men and lesbians, this time medical and irreversible through hormones and surgery.

[Róisín Michaux @RoisinMichaux]

The same week the Dutch government adopted a ban on trying to reason your child out of their sex dissociation, a girl "transitioning" to be a boy murdered her parents in their home.

There is no evidence so far that it was a medicated transition, but it was certainly a "social transition" (meaning everyone around her had to pretend to think she is a boy)

Anecdotes and news reports suggest the girl is mentally unwell (obviously). It will soon be illegal to tell such a girl that she is not a boy, and to diagnose her sex dissociation as a symptom of her mental illness.

[Masih Alinejad @AlinejadMasih]

Tell me: where are the headlines?

The ink on the deal wasn’t even dry before the Islamic Republic showed its true face. Its first move? Sentencing singer Parastoo Ahmadi to 74 lashes for singing without hijab.
Yes, In 21st-century singing is forbidden for women in Iran.

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

The West is being k!lled from within

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Another TiM is convicted of sexual crimes.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

BREAKING: New Hampshire’s first transgender elected Rep., Stacie Laughton (D), sentenced to 33 YEARS in prison for the s*xual exploitation of children.

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Truth is eventually revealed

[Woman is biology, not ideology @Tweeterer411]

Criminals, the whole lot

[MAGS 🔑⛏️🚒 @Crypto_Mags]

The Canadian government wants your 🍆 pics! Now that I have your attention, this is true, but it's much worse than that.

Canada is about to enact a complete surveillance state with Bill C-22, and its companion pieces, Bill C-34 and Bill C-36. These 3 bills stacked together create a terrifying surveillance infrastructure.

It starts with Bill C-22, which represents an egregious overreach into the digital privacy of everyday Canadians by introducing a one-year metadata retention mandate, dangerous encryption mandates, and a significantly lower bar for law enforcement to pull and access personal ID without judicial oversight:
1. No more encrypted messages
2. Records kept on you
3. Your Data shared by other gov
4. Platforms will share your data and not tell you
Plus your data is a honeypot rife for hackers. When multiple large tech companies that track you are telling the gov this is overreach, it's serious!

Bill C-34's new powers grants this unelected Commission unchecked authority to dictate how millions of Canadians verify their age. It forces us to surrender government ID or undergo facial scans just to use social media. It gives the gov the mandate to dictate what content platforms must remove, establishes law-enforcement-style powers to compel testimony, and allows them to bypass standard legal rules of evidence and conduct hearings in total secrecy.

It also hands an unprecedented level of control over the entire Canadian internet to a single, unelected body: The Digital Safety Commission of Canada. This "super-regulator" will function combines the conflicting roles of rule-maker, investigator, judge, and public advocate into one entity. The elimination of a separate, independent Ombudsperson destroys any semblance of systemic fairness.

The insane part is that at its start, a single cabinet-appointed Chair alone can comprise the full Commission!!! One person can write the rules on age verification, order speech removed from the internet, investigate platforms, and levy multi-million dollar penalties. It's s a dictatorship over the Canadian internet.

Lastly, the social media ban for minors re Bill C-36. social media bans enforced via digital ID and age verification simply do not work. Instead of protecting youth, these mandates actively push children away from mainstream, regulated platforms and toward the darker, unmonitored corners of the internet where safety measures don't existent. Parents should be in charge of their kids, not the government and we already have tech solutions to achieve this! Let's call a spade a spade: under the guise of "protecting the kids," the true, functional intent of these provisions is to build a massive, pervasive architecture designed to surveil and track the digital lives of the adult population in Canada.

The Liberals are rushing far-reaching digital regulations without proper scrutiny, transparent debate, and meaningful public consultation. As a former public servant, this government is profoundly undemocratic.

I urge Canadians to stand up for your privacy and voice your opposition to these bills now and in the future if they pass so they can be repealed.

Sources & links below