SON

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE No one believes in your bullshit ideas for a reason btw and if you talked to any biologist they'd be baffled, it's very clear how you have no sources for ur numbers Lmao

You're clearly NOT pointing and laughing btw, you're clearly bothered by everything, I'm happy about that

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE 0 studies showing anything, first you said 7:1, I asked where you got that number from, then you said its either 6 or 8 to 1, (IDK where you got those numbers from).

I've at least had many studies backing me up to show humans are monogamous and most of us are meant to reproduce

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE I mean it's VERY clear you know jackshit about biology lol because no one would make such a statement. You can be ignorant all you want, still 0 studies on your end and thats a fact

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE Already disproved you so cope harder. The 50/50 distribution is natural. It'll stay whether you like it or not LMAO "male entitlement" no women just desire men, humans are generally heterosexual. do you seethe in anger when u see het couples? LOL

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE no retard you said it was unnatural even tho I proved it's natural, well it's already natural because of fishers principle but whatever

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE naturally we have 50/50 gender ratio which is what im saying, and fishers principle proves it. You might argue "but this natural aspect is actually bad" and it would make your argument stronger, because nature tends to have natural things that are bad. rape, murder, etc

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE I know many lesbians I'm in California lmao. And you never denied you are a cuck.
All the lesbians I know are in monogamous relationships. Perhaps you are one of the few cucks? What do they call a lesbian cuck anyway?

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE "factually untrue" how retard, it's literally fishers principle. the 50/50 ratio is observed in humans as well. amazing goalpost dodge.

"every specimen is owed an offspring" I never said this, but most reproduce. Women always are with normal men. in hunter gatherer tribes too

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE Fishers' principle has been observed across mammal species and concepts like patriarchy neither create nor refute it.

When one sex becomes rarer, producing that sex becomes evolutionarily advantageous, so natural selection corrects the sex ratios. IE, nature wants a 50/50 ratio

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE False, monogamous countries aren't Christian. the western world is pretty much secular, people just like being monogamous, we don't want to see our lover with another person.
maybe you're a cuck, so you're ok with it. never met a lesbian cuck before until today LOL

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE Lmao what do you think it means? 🤣it's a principle explaining why the sex ratio is 1:1. Pretty much automatically disproving your retarded thought about "muh 7:1 ratio":

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE And all polygamy countries are islamic shitholes and if anything, it refutes you. 1 man for many woman is a total male fantasy that only occurs in certain harem species

in humans, multiple women don't want to share one man. More general observations about how we are monogamous.

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE They provide generality lol, and it's quite literally true. you have no data to back yourself up, when I show you many studies showing this generality, you deny them. You don't have a single study backing anything up

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE You would have to disprove Fisher's principle if your argument would have any hold so. Evolution forces a 50/50 ratio. nature doesn't want a 7:1 ratio in mammals. In fact, human births are 105 men per women because men keep dying, Fisher's principle in play

[Freddy @Flodsvinet2]

This is a lie
All that food is meant for Haaland
If we don't keep him well-fed he might start feeding on local wildlife

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE "50/50 is the unnatural distribution guys" This in itself showed me more than enough, you have no clue about your theoretical society at all, I've already cooked you enough

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE Translation for - "I'm sorry twistedHate3, I was wrong and I'm unable to find the scientific evidence to debunk your accurate claims"

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE you can't debunk it, you think the study publishers would have a disclaimer that fully discredits their study? You didn't bother reading past it LOL

You can't even bring about a 7:1 ratio, Fischer's principle quite literally obliterates your entire argument

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE https://t.co/yt0o1Cdog6

[SON @twistedHate3]

@PlNKG0RE Impossible for you to engage with the actual content, sending the study wont make a difference. Science isn't on your side, I have the studies, do you have a single one? I'm saying we're generally pair bonders, so disprove that
https://t.co/LfUpo7Uux7
https://t.co/mLb7wXPOUa