"I’ve seen a lot of criticism of RFK Jr. since his autism speech yesterday.
So I decided to do something radical… I watched the full speech.
(I know — crazy concept: go to the source and form your own opinion instead of blindly repeating media narratives and social media memes.)
And what I found didn’t exactly match the headlines.
So in this post, I want to address the five biggest criticisms I’ve seen and share my take.
But first — let me say this:
Whatever you think of his policies, one thing seems clear to me after listening to RFK Jr. speak: he genuinely seems to care about the children and families affected by autism. You can disagree with his conclusions, but to paint him as evil or malicious is unfair... and, frankly, dishonest.
⸻
Criticism #1: “He called autism an ’epidemic.’”
Yes, he did ... to highlight the steep rise in diagnoses. (CDC data shows 1 in 31 kids today.)
The term "epidemic" does not always imply something contagious. I find it unlikely that those criticizing his use of the word "epidemic" showed the same level of outrage when it was used to describe the obesity epidemic or the fentanyl epidemic.
⸻
Criticism #2: “He said autistic kids will never have jobs, never pay taxes, never go on dates.”
This is wildly misleading and out of context. Just moments before making that statement, he referred specifically to the 25% of cases classified as severe (children who are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and unable to care for themselves). Clearly, within this context, his remarks were not about all autistic children. Anyone claiming otherwise is either unaware of this context or deliberately misrepresenting his words.
⸻
Criticism #3: “He rejected the science — autism is genetic, not caused by toxins.”
This claim misrepresents his stance. He didn’t dismiss the role of genetics; rather, he stated that while genes might create a vulnerability, they alone cannot explain an epidemic. This perspective is far from fringe. Even the CDC acknowledges that environmental factors may play a role. His argument isn’t anti-science; it’s a reasonable call for a more balanced exploration of potential causes.
⸻
Criticism #4: “He’s pushing anti-vax conspiracy theories again!”
This one is just false. Not once during his 27-minute speech did he mention vaccines. Instead, he discussed toxins such as mold, pesticides, and additives. But the media (who appear to hate him for past positions) decided to resurrect the vaccine angle even though he didn’t bring it up. This is yet another example of a targeted smear campaign by individuals more invested in promoting narratives than seeking the truth.
⸻
Criticism #5: “His words were emotionally harmful to autistic people and their families.”
I guess this one depends on your perspective. Yes, his language was intense, but maybe what’s also harmful is ignoring the existence of the most severe forms of autism. RFK Jr. is amplifying the voices of parents whose children face extreme challenges, such as self-injurious behaviors, inability to speak, constant supervision needs, and requiring round-the-clock care. These families are real, and their struggles are profound. For once, someone on a national platform is recognizing their pain and saying, “We see you, and we are committed to understanding why this is happening.”
⸻
I’m not saying RFK Jr. is perfect. His words could’ve been clearer. His policy ideas are certainly open to scrutiny. But let’s stop pretending he dehumanized autistic people or rejected science.
He’s asking tough questions. He’s challenging the status quo.
And instead of outrage, maybe we should welcome the conversation.
Watch the speech. Check the CDC data.
And let’s focus on facts instead of clickbait."
-Written by Tyson Zahner
The people going around calling everybody 'Nazis' now were advocating forced medical procedures, mass censorship, discrimination, segregation, job termination, healthcare denial, making people show their papers everywhere, and even putting them in camps, just 3-4 years ago.
Never forget.
This is what Pfizer wanted kept under wraps for 75 years: the 'safe and effective vaccine' with 9 pages of side effects.
DON’T FORGET TO SHARE THIS
EVERYBODY NEEDS TO SEE IT
Join: @OfficialJDVanceMaga
In a chilling blow to religious freedom, Amish children in New York are now being forced to receive vaccinations against their families’ deeply held beliefs—under threat of massive fines and exclusion from their own private schools.
https://t.co/Ay9hRbm8WV
@EndTribalism Fauci and all his allies did everything they could to destroy this man during COVID. His only crime was that he was sticking to the science and telling the truth. He will be a great addition to Trump’s team.
The most important video on X today!
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: “Science should be an engine for knowledge and freedom, not something that stands on top of society and says you must do this or else.”
“It shouldn’t be pushing covid vaccines.”
“The proper role of scientists in a pandemic is to answer basic questions that policy makers have about what the right policy should be.”
“The role of scientists shouldn’t be to say you can’t send your kids to school for two years.”
“If science is a force for freedom and knowledge, it will have universal support.”
Jay Bhattacharya on the topic most would-be NIH directors would assiduously avoid: How much NIH research is irreproducible or outright fraudulent? The fake amyloid beta *56 protein in Alzheimer's research is the perfect example.
🚨COMMON KNOWLEDGE ALERT🚨
(When everybody knows that *everybody knows*)
The vaccines are unsafe. This is now coming out in a flood of awareness that cannot be stopped. Soon it will be Common Knowledge that the mRNA experimental products harmed people. Everybody will know that everybody knows the same thing; the vaccines were behind the rash of sudden deaths and Aunt Sally's sudden decline.
But wait until they realize the second part; that they were *deliberately* harmed. Pharma knew their products were unsafe and they hid that from the public.
The CDC knew the jabs were unsafe as well because they refused to collect base data that would show the harm and when the CDC accidentally received that data they then did what they could to suppress those results from public view. The CDC then went on to recommend the jabs to 12-year-olds and eventually all the way down to 6-month-olds.
The FDA also knew the jabs were dangerous and conspired to hide that information from the public. They tried to hide the Pfizer documents for 75 years. They failed to warn about the presence of DNA fragments and even whole plasmids with SV40 promoter regions that could cause genetic damage and cancers in a proportion of the human victims of the mRNA experiments.
But even that doesn't get to the depths of the darkness.
The final revelation which many people will not be able to psychologically handle is that the spike protein itself was engineered to be toxic.
The gull-length spike protein has 4 regions from the HIV (AIDS virus) gp120 protein which may account for its devastating immune system destruction. It has amyloid regions that are the probable trigger for the immense clotting issues that have been medically plaguing people (brain fog, strokes, etc), especially including the 'calamari clots' seen post-mortem.
It has several keys to enter various types of cells besides the ACE2 keyhole, when a normal virus usually only has a single key to a single cellular lock. Where and how did Covid get all these keys to the human cellular kingdom?
In a lab, which the NIAID and Welcome Trust and the Mean Girls virology club conspired to hide from everyone.
So why did Pfizer and Moderna both "independently" choose to use that full-length, engineered-to-be-toxic, protein in their jab formula?
Normally a vaccine uses the smallest antigenic sequences possible to train the immune system to respond. Because an antibody protein can only cover ~6 amino acids of topography (think how much of an elephant's body your hand could cover at any one time) it wouldn't make sense to design a vaccine around a string of amino acids that is hundreds of units long.
But every single pharma company, "independently" all decided to build their products around the full-length spike protein measuring a whopping 1273 amino acids. Not 6, or 40 or even 100, but all 1273.
Why?
It makes no sense from a manufacturing standpoint; longer is harder. It makes no sense from a medical standpoint because you're training the body to make a whole bunch of 'non-sterilizing' antibodies along with the ones that block viral entry into cells.
But it does make sense from the standpoint of injecting people with a toxic substance that would cause long-term issues such as heart damage, immune dysregulation, neurological damage, and infertility.
You see, each one of those conditions has a downstream product to sell into. If that sounds too dark, the next six months are going to be brutal for you in terms of revelations.
The people who did this are the same people who hid the fact that their products caused SIDS and autism. Do you really think people who would knowingly kill babies in their cribs would hesitate even slightly to produce a jab that would harm an adult? I don't.
To say I am infuriated is an understatement. We must hold the people who did this accountable. It cannot be overlooked and swept under the rug.
P.S. Did "kill babies in their cribs" sound hyperbolic? I suppose it does, but that's a factual statement (from Miller & Goldman, 2011, a study across 30 countries, more vaccines = more dead babies):
Fraudulent paper submitted to discredit a preexisting available treatment for COVID that would hamper the issuance of the EUA for the mRNA Covid vaccines. EUA’s can’t be issued for vaccines if other treatments are available. Shows intent and forethought of a conspiracy.
🚨BREAKING! Trump admin considers banning Covid vaccines for all age groups! After extensive research the Pfizer and Moderna gene products need to be pulled, due to unacceptable side effects and extensive DNA contamination within the Pfizer product. No LNP, and no DNA, period!
We don’t know the full story of what happened with the crash landing in Toronto, or the other recent emergency incidents, some tragically deadly.
It will take months or years of investigation to piece together a story, and pieces of the puzzle will be missed.
We don’t know what happened exactly. It would be callous to call it a DEI failure, or to neglect the extreme weather that surely was a factor.
But what I do know, as a former flight attendant married to an off-duty pilot, this truth:
Aviation has lost its integrity.
Prior to 2020, safety standards had reached the zenith of their clean record heights, and were cruising steadily.
Crews were trained with this core idea: there is no room for big egos in an aircraft.
CRM became a standard in aviation; where flight crews and cabin crews were trained in co-communication. Most of the deadliest aviation accidents prior were a combination of factors that mostly always included the hubris of the captain, who ignored signals and dismissed the warnings of his crew.
CRM sought to change that. It worked.
SOPs, or standards of procedure, were meant as a guide, but intuition, communication, responsibility, respect, adaptation and flexibility were fostered as characteristics that were sought out and nurtured among pilots and the back crew.
Aviation was a meritocracy. You didn’t get chosen to be the pilot in command because you knew someone, because of your intersectional points or because of your politics.
You got chosen because you were the best.
DEI nuzzled its way in to dismantled all of that, of course, but it’s only a part of the picture.
You cannot speak freely and communicate with integrity if you’re afraid of misgendering the public or the flight attendant in the back.
But even beyond all of that, the real elephant in the room?
Covid lockdowns.
Covid lockdowns pitched the aviation world into high anxiety. The individuals who flew airplanes lost their jobs for months, for years, along with their cars, their homes, their relationships, their identities.
They were forced to get jabbed or not go back to work.
Days before the force jab protocol, Transport Canada came out with a reminder statement to flight crews: their pilot licenses were “incompatible with medical trials”.
Some person with his head screwed on straight had the integrity to make the memo.
Days later, after my husband, and I’m sure other lone pilots took notice and wrote to Transport Canada, the memo was removed from the website.
Pilots are expected to go through the most robust physical examinations yearly to prove their fitness to fly.
What do you think happened to the standard of these medical exams? What do you think happened to the bar when people started becoming ill?
What do you think happened when leave-of-absences among the pilot cohort increased by more than tenfold?
What do you think happened when pilots close to retirement, or those with any critical thinking skills and backbone, retired early or quit entirely, rather than subject themselves to the coerced jab?
Who stayed?
And what kind of people followed in their footsteps?
My husband woke up one day, and saw the news: his good friend had died suddenly on layover, a year or so after the Covid vaccine enforcement, in his hotel room post flight.
A healthy man in his early forties.
Flight crews go up to 35,000 feet and down again over 20 times a month, at least, and cruise at a cabin altitude of 6000 feet.
You can’t scuba dive two weeks before or after flying, you can’t give blood.
But you could take a clot shot.
And what do you think this coercion did to the minds of the people who stayed? The ones who knew they shouldn’t do it, but did?
What kind of psychological fitness remains in the skies?
Who dares talk about the elephant in the room?
Aviation has lost its integrity.
The Surgisphere deception showed the extent they felt they needed to go to to kill Hydroxychloroquine.
Need a study to be used as a pretext to end trials using HCQ .. fabricate one and publish it in the Lancet.
You mean that one?
@Jikkyleaks
No surprise. The Surgisphere scandal was Harvard.
They’ve become great fakers.
Top Harvard cancer researchers accused of scientific fraud; 37 studies affected https://t.co/OXs3hSDmGs
Surgisphere was an American healthcare analytics company founded in 2008 by Sapan Desai. Initially, it was involved in marketing medical textbooks to medical students but later shifted its focus towards healthcare data analytics.
BILL GATES: “The next [pandemic] could be far more severe … There’s even some pathogens out there that we’re watching over right now. So maybe a 10% chance in the next four years.”
Trump just signed executive order for sovereign wealth fund. Howard Lutnick says off to his right with the press “if we sell 2 billion Covid vaccines we should have equity warrants in those companies.” 🤦♂️
Yeah hard freaking no! A couple of steps forward then some steps back.
Very bad idea.