✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯

Ninth Gen American - Vet - INFJ - Lutheran - Anglocentrist - Moderate Southern Democrat

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

Mine

The more obscure lore of my ancestry are my Basque ancestors who settled in Mexico under Maximilian I’s short lived colonization programs.

[Jonathan ☧ ▐┛ @TheRealJP2009]

Flags that represent my ethnicities

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@ShitpostRock2 @thechudda Night of the Long Knives: groyper edition

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@mattforney L troon out

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@HunterBiden @PolycomputingAI That’s an incredibly low hanging fruit to pick. Fucking retard

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@Katechoncriollo @KaiserW1914_II I think it’s more likely that they would have recognized Dixie, but not joined the war with them. Dixie’s efforts were primarily rooted in achieving state recognition and economic sovereignty, like with Great Britain.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@Katechoncriollo @KaiserW1914_II That’s literally never been official policy. Maximilian was even friendly to the Confederacy and vice versa.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@McJuggerNuggets Bro fuck you. You literally posted the video yourself and on a monetized platform.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@N_ticx @FearedBuck Then you should honestly be in jail

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@BasedMutt_ Nah

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@HeathGreencliff @Libraryhz Savitri literally deified him though

[Jared Taylor @RealJarTaylor]

Farewell to Paris

Day before yesterday I spent the afternoon autographing French translations of my books in what is called an identitarian bookstore, filled exclusively with titles of the kind Amazon loves to ban and that would never be displayed in an American bookstore. If there were such a store in, say, Chicago or New York City, antifa would break the windows, cover the place in graffiti, and even attack customers. I spent three very pleasant hours signing copies of my books and chatting with people kind enough to say that my writing had been an inspiration to them.

Yesterday, however, I experienced something equally unlikely in the United States. A group of identitarians called Les Natifs (the natives) had arranged a talk for me. The event had been advertised discreetly on social media, but the police became aware of it and contacted the head of the group to say that it was forbidden to hold the meeting within the city limits of Paris. The Natives arranged at a moment's notice to move the meeting to the nearby town of Versailles. We all gathered there and I had just been introduced and was beginning my talk, when the police burst in and explained that it was an illegal meeting and that we were to disperse. The officer in charge handed me a lengthy document listing the grounds on which the meeting had been declared illegal. Ironically, one of those grounds was the famous French Declaration of the Rights of Man. Apparently it does not apply to the white man, certainly not if he is defending his right to remain master in his own home. The document went on to explain that given my past statements, it was likely that by speaking in Versailles, I would fall afoul of hate speech laws and by so doing disturb the public order. By silencing me in advance, the French state was protecting me from the possibility of arrest and deportation. I'm grateful to these officers of the French Republic for their kind consideration.

I lived in Paris as a student, and I'm still very fond of the city despite the Great Replacement that has transformed vast parts of it. I look forward, someday, to returning under more welcoming circumstances.

On a more serious note, all orthodoxies lash out most viciously as they die, and the orthodoxy of egalitarianism and dispossession is dying before our eyes. The French State loses legitimacy with every act of repression and censorship.

Comrades, whatever your nationality, wherever you live, the fight goes on, from strength to strength. We have the right to be us, and only we can be us!

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@Izzy1788138 Get you some nice cotton flags

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@I_amMukhtar And?

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@AFpost who actually gives a fuck

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@MiaBryant374659 Delete your account then lol

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@joshfontanilla @RestoreBritain This is why you can’t take people like this seriously lol.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

No wonder every point you've made is incomplete and lacking in original thought LOL.

Also, can you not read? There are already two points where they plan to deport those with legal status.

Page 97: Retrospective revocation of asylum/humanitarian protections for those who entered illegally in the last decade.

Page 58: E-visa becomes the only proof of residency. Physical settled-status documents become invalid after a deadline — non-holders lose the right to reside.

That creates a significant pathway. But of course, since you only judge things by buzzwords and let AI to do reading for you, I'm not really surprised that went over your head.

Additionally, look (actually read please, don't use a fucking ai bot lol) at their actual manifesto on their site: "If a legally resident foreign national is unable to speak English, lives in social housing, claims benefits, refuses to work, fails to integrate, commits crime or actively hates our way of life and wishes to do us harm, they will be deported."

The mass deportations paper is also explicitly labeled as the first in a series focused on illegals. Ignoring this and then raging like a spoilt child over them not mentioning certain words is next level retarded.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@joshfontanilla @RestoreBritain Already did lol. https://t.co/yGmRQYbN4Y

Do you actually get Grok's approval before you send out your own original thoughts LMFAO

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

No wonder every point you've made is incomplete and lacking in original thought LOL.

Also, can you not read? There are already two points where they plan to deport those with legal status.

Page 97: Retrospective revocation of asylum/humanitarian protections for those who entered illegally in the last decade.

Page 58: E-visa becomes the only proof of residency. Physical settled-status documents become invalid after a deadline — non-holders lose the right to reside.

That creates a significant pathway. But of course, since you only judge things by buzzwords and let AI to do reading for you, I'm not really surprised that went over your head.

Additionally, look (actually read please, don't use a fucking ai bot lol) at their actual manifesto on their site: "If a legally resident foreign national is unable to speak English, lives in social housing, claims benefits, refuses to work, fails to integrate, commits crime or actively hates our way of life and wishes to do us harm, they will be deported."

The mass deportations paper is also explicitly labeled as the first in a series focused on illegals. Ignoring this and then raging like a spoilt child over them not mentioning certain words is next level retarded.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

It literally never says "will be allowed to stay." You're taking a preliminary policy, completely ignoring subsequent effects and ramifications, and jumping to a conclusion that you're basing off of them not talking about it. Then you're hiding behind it because you can't disprove a negative.

That's not how adults make educated conclusions, especially if you actually understand anything about politics. Restore Britain has always maintained a posture that creating a hostile environment for immigrants is what will dramatically decrease numbers, for both illegal and legal ones.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

Did you?

“All asylum and humanitarian protections granted to individuals who entered Britain illegally within the last decade should be rescinded in full, and those individuals deported.” (p. 97, Retrospective Action)

“Any individual not in possession of an e-visa – even if they do possess physical documentation attesting to settled status – shall then be determined not to have any right to reside in Britain.” (p. 58, E-Visas)

There are clear pathways to removing legal migrants outlined here. It’s not complete, but this is actually how policy works, especially for things that require dramatic solutions.

Even more significant than that is the overhaul and restructuring of existing law under the ECHR and Human Rights Act. These are wildly prevalent obstacles and if you’re not aware of how detrimental both of those have been to foreign migration to Europe, you shouldn’t be talking about this to begin with.

Yet you’re soy raging because they’re not saying specific buzzwords that you want to here. And how do you base your evaluation of their policy? By searching up random words on their timeline.

[✯ Hill Country Nationalist ✯ @tx_hcn]

@joshfontanilla @RestoreBritain They’re one of the few political organizations that actually published a manifesto on HOW they will conduct mass deportations. Meanwhile, you’re the only one looking for buzzwords via word search and then accusing them of having meaningless rhetoric

https://t.co/HoXZZq7qbh