@parthurgraff@matthewnielsen De-regulate a government program after increasing regulation? Do you hear yourself? Governments don’t de-regulate themselves.
@parthurgraff@matthewnielsen Hire more people.
Oh wait, Hobbs won’t let them.
Vote her out, hire more ESA employees, and see the improvements begin overnight. The issues you’re describing are ALREADY against ESA rules. More regulations won’t fix it.
@parthurgraff@matthewnielsen The public is saying there’s a wildfire. We KNOW there isn’t. Pretending to put out the wildfire is the answer?
ALL expenses are still up for audit up to two years later. The autoapprove policy ensures no delay in waiting to hear back if pencils are okay to purchase.
@ClarkRimsza@GoldwaterInst@azfec@AZlovesESAs This is final?? I know the court ordered to recalculate with a different formula if it fell short, so this is after the recalculation?
@HurtsNobody@azesamemes If $37 billion is merely a “distraction,” what would that make $20 million? Negligible? Surely the smaller amount shouldn’t garner MORE attention. If so, then logically 100% fraud in ESA will draw LESS attention. Is that what you want?
@HurtsNobody@azesamemes You contradict yourself so much.
ESAs are unconstitutional and need to be abolished by amendment.
ESAs are okay for SPED students, but instead of fixing it, abolish it first.
Recreate ESAs for SPED-only students. Somehow it won’t be unconstitutional this time.
🧐
@HurtsNobody@azesamemes You assume I have kids that aren’t SPED. SPED families are abusing it too?
The solution to help SPED students is to abolish the ESA program? How exactly does that help because I haven’t heard that one before?
@HurtsNobody@azesamemes If it’s unconstitutional, you can get rid of ESAs with a simple lawsuit. No need to vote on it to get rid of it that way.
If you need another amendment to get rid of ESAs, then it sounds like it’s currently constitutional.
Thanks for admitting your hate for SPED students.
@CraigHarrisNews@wapo They didn’t mean it literally. What would be exciting about keeping possession of the literal mansion other than the fact it means they are in control of the governorship?
@HurtsNobody@azesamemes If they are unconstitutional then SOS AZ would’ve had a slam-dunk lawsuit to get rid of ESAs. Instead they had to lie to voters to get enough signatures to put it on the ballot, just to hamstring ESAs and not get rid of them completely.
Even they know it’s constitutional.
@rojujim@azesamemes Again, sounds like you have no issues with kidnappers, a pedophile, traffickers, wanna-be murderers, etc having access to names and addresses of the voters they meet
@rojujim@azesamemes Doesn’t matter. Several are convicted felons, which disqualifies them from circulating.
Like it or not, there is no such requirement to not be a felon to be president. Would be possible to convict political opponents as felons to prevent them from holding office