My blog on China's new arms control white paper. Short on arsenal details, long on sticking to the same strategy. Interesting bits include focus on developing countries' right to emerging tech for development + risk reduction with Chinese characteristics. https://t.co/3XulDOa6Io
I view the concept of "ghost towns" as one of the most embarrassing Western inventions of this century, an admission of civilizational inferiority. "oh you build infrastructure first and THEN people move in? Bold, heh… no, REAL cities start as shantytowns, u dumb commie"
Their absence of self-awareness is a serious pathology. They just killed 3k civilians (really, civilians) and are complaining that their invading soldiers are facing some risks WHILE INVADING.
"Imperfect but basically effective." Did Biden rejoin the JCPOA when you were APNSA? I must have missed that. The wet-fingered triangulation routine is part of how we got here—you don't defend an effective, successful agreement by constantly damning it with faint praise.
@AngelicaOung@NickKristof It's still generally counterproductive to kick out journos like this, even if NYT China coverage can sometimes be a bit sensationalist it's not like it's going to get any better if done from Taipei or Tokyo.
@gonglei89 I think Xi being willing to acknowledge that controlled competition is an ok framing for the relationship represents a shift. Like ok, if you insist, but let's at least keep it from getting messy.
@shetlerjones@Mariusj001 That comment from the Taiwan Affairs Office is from January 2024, so yes. It would be interesting to see how that language has evolved over time, but looks like the two have been tied together for a while.
@shetlerjones@Mariusj001 That's true, but PRC has connected "upholding 92" and "opposing independence" as preconditions for engagement for quite a while, so I don't really see how this is a dramatic shift in their approach. https://t.co/j9zmOhADvd
@shetlerjones@Mariusj001 It has to be One China (PRC or ROC), no Taiwan. The issue from Beijing's side is Taiwan as an entity independent of "China," whether that China is ROC or PRC, thus opposing independence.
@nise_yoshimi Ah yes, the dude who wrote about how China been lying for centuries about the effect of the opium trade had on their society. We can know that because there is no medical evidence opium is bad for you.
@baoshaoshan@gonglei89 Feels like this has been the trend going back to Covid, but now I feel like govt is trying harder to facilitate it through more school holidays etc.
Some takeaways from the Beijing summit, now that Trump is back on Air Force One. Short version: this was a stability-preservation exercise, both sides knew it, both sides got what they came for, and yeah I call that win-win. 🧵
NYT reporting on classified U.S. intelligence assessments of Iranian missile capacity reiterates that they maintained 70% of their missiles and launchers but adds that 90% of their underground storage and launch facilities are also still active.
Iran had designed is missile program with the acknowledgement of not being able to protect its airspace and relied on hardened underground "missile cities" to compensate. U.S. and Israeli attacks apparently disabled the entrances to some of these facilities and hit surface buildings. But as many observed at the time the attacks were failing to actually penetrate the underground facilities where the operations were carried out and missiles kept in storage. Most problematically for a renewed campaign the missile complexes near Hormuz are almost all still active according to the assessment.
If the U.S. intel assessment is accurate it also explains why Iran was able to maintain a steady rate of missile fire until the end of the war, and also suggests that the U.S. and Israel simply wasted a lot of top-tier standoff munitions firing at rock complexes that it failed to penetrate.
Prof. John Mearsheimer:
If I was the national security adviser to Xi Jinping… I should tell Xi Jinping that he should try to be a regional hegemon.
China should try to push the United States out beyond the first island chain and then out beyond the second island chain.
If we have a Monroe doctrine, they should have a Monroe doctrine.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
@NicoleGrajewski@dex_eve@ArmsControlWonk It's still an assumption that the arsenal growth means a change in doctrine. And there were in fact Chinese experts warning that China's arsenal may grow, even as early as Bush's withdrawal from the ABM.