Cheat Fund @udaex03 - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

8 months ago

THE SPACE DUOPOLY: $RKLB & $ASTS AFTER THE $800B SPACEX SHOCKWAVE SpaceX raising at an $800 billion valuation should terrify every government and every investor who understands strategic infrastructure. One company cannot carry an entire nation’s security, launch, and orbital logistics forever. That’s where Rocket Lab (RKLB) and AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) step in — the most important “second pillars” in the new space economy. This is not a moonshot thesis. This is a national-infrastructure thesis $RKLB: THE ONLY REAL SECOND SOURCE TO SPACEX For a decade, SpaceX has carried ~70% of global launch capacity on its back. That is now a national security risk. The Pentagon cannot rely on one company valued at nearly a trillion dollars. RKLB is the solution. Why RKLB matters •Manufactures almost every critical component in-house (engines, composites, avionics, guidance) •Vertical integration = lower costs + faster cycles + supply-chain independence •Already launching missions for NASA, Space Force, NRO, and defense primes •Neutron rocket is being built specifically to provide U.S. launch redundancy if SpaceX is unavailable •Multi-year government contracts → predictable revenue Rocket Lab isn’t trying to become SpaceX. They’re becoming the insurance policy for America’s orbital infrastructure. Where RKLB can realistically go If Neutron captures even 8–12% of U.S. government + defense launch volume: •That’s $1.5B–$3B annual revenue •At a conservative 4–6× sales multiple → $6B–$18B market cap potential (vs ~current ~$2B) If RKLB becomes the official second-source launcher, those numbers double. $ASTS: THE ORBITAL COMM NETWORK OF THE 2030s If Rocket Lab builds the highway, ASTS runs the traffic. ASTS is building a space-based cellular network that connects directly to normal smartphones. No dish. No hardware add-ons. No rural towers. No Wi-Fi. Why carriers are lining up For AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, etc., this unlocks: •Global coverage without spending billions on land towers •Wholesale network economics •Recurring revenue without infrastructure build-out ASTS already has commercial agreements with: •AT&T •Vodafone •Rakuten •Multiple undisclosed Tier-1 carriers These are not MOUs. They are capacity deals with clear revenue paths once the constellation is live. Where ASTS can realistically go If ASTS captures just 1–2% of global cellular data via wholesale contracts: •That’s $3B–$6B annual recurring revenue •Satellite networks trade at 5–8× ARR •That implies $15B–$48B valuation potential (vs current <$1B) If ASTS becomes the default global rural + emergency + oceanic coverage layer, the upside is even larger SpaceX at $800B forces the market to reprice the entire space sector. You cannot have a near-trillion-dollar anchor and assume every other company stays microcap. Space is becoming: •A national security layer •A telecom backbone •A logistics network •A defense multiplier RKLB becomes the American backup launcher. ASTS becomes the orbital telecom layer. Both become essential. The next decade of compounding will not be in meme rockets or tourist flights. It will be in companies that solve structural problems for governments and global carriers. Space is no longer a theme. It’s a new asset class. •RKLB → U.S. launch independence •ASTS → planetary communications infrastructure One builds the highway. One monetizes the traffic. And both have multi-billion-dollar paths ahead as SpaceX’s valuation rewrites the ceiling for the entire industry.

0

7

0

1K

Cheat Fund

@udaex03

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users