@CMonteroOficial Gente que piensa que estas tierras fueron “robadas” demuestran una total y absoluta ignorancia y malagradecimiento de esta gran nacion, incluyendote a ti, que te permite vociferar ridiculeces por medio de esta plataforma.
@dw_espanol@melaniacarrion “Colapso de la democracia” no tienen ni idea de lo que significa democracia.
Preocupense de arreglar sus paises primero, asi sus ciudadanos no se ven obligados al autodestierro hacia el norte donde, segun ustedes, la democracia esta “colapsando”
Ridiculos
@nmasunivision La ignorancia de vivir en una de las sociedades mas prosperas en la historia y no saber apreciarla.
Que verguenza…
Si, se como se vive en caso contrario en otras tierras, por eso lo se.
Perdon, pero que tamaña estupidez.
Más vale que la sociedades pidan mínimamente una prueba de identidad a quien está ejerciendo su voto, me parece algo fundamental para evitar cualquier tipo de errores o peor aun, fraude.
Quizás será porque la izquierda a nivel mundial se ha caracterizado por fraudes para ganar sus elecciones? Será por eso que empujan a diestra y siniestra tan estúpida idea?
No, se llama ejercer las leyes.
Es penoso? Porsupuesto.
Racista?
No
EEUU no es perfecto, pero si es una sociedad con mas orden.
No asi nuestros paises, con un desorden absoluto donde las leyes son ejercidas de acuerdo al gobierno de turno.
Dejemos de promulgar falsas narrativas que la verdad, no ayuda a nadie.
In case anyone was wondering, this was the real motive behind today’s press conference.
Mayor Mamdani promised a laundry list of “free” giveaways to buy votes, with no plan to pay for them. Now that the math doesn’t work, instead of owning the fact that he misled New Yorkers, he’s blaming me.
Let’s be clear: I left him over $8 BILLION in reserves.
This is the same Mamdani who spent years attacking me for not spending enough during the migrant crisis.
The only reason those reserves exist is because I ignored him and his socialist comrades who demanded we blow billions more with no guardrails.
“Free” isn’t free. It’s just a bill someone else has to pay.
🚨 LEFTIST HOAX DESTROYED 🚨
New video shows Alex Pretti violently attacking federal officers and destroying federal law enforcement vehicles. His firearm is fully visible in the footage.
This video PROVES that Alex Pretti was not an ‘innocent bystander’ or ‘legal observer’
He was a violent agitator and psychopath hellbent on attacking federal law enforcement.
Another left wing hoax destroyed
What was happening in the Obama era.
For people to stop getting in the way of law enforcement and for blue states to start handing over their undocumented with criminal records.
Simple.
Oh! And Of course, the effing media to stop the false narratives and propaganda.
That’s all…
Haber, el que alguien haya pedido asilo, no le garantiza nada.
Nada.
Se da la noticia como que cualquier imigrante que aplique una solicitud de “asilo” ya automaticamente eso lo protege.
No.
Lastimosamente no es ese el caso.
Informese mejor, ustedes como “periodistas” tienen la responsabilidad de informar verazmente, no lo que la falsa narrativa y propagandismo esta promiviendo.
No sea parte de el problema.
@JudiciaryDems@JudiciaryDems Yeah, you forgot to add “Biden’s era” before “government…”
Report the whole story if you are going to share this child’s tragedy
You people have no shame…
🚨I DIDNT WANT to do it BUT I have too.
You didn’t see this yet.
The narrative that “he was just filming and the officers got angry” is false.
The narrative that he was only trying to protect two women is also false.
He, along with others, was actively interfering with a legitimate law-enforcement operation. That is why officers moved them off the street.
That does not mean he deserved to die.
When officers attempted to detain him, he resisted arrest.
That does not mean he deserved to die.
He was armed and chose to insert himself into an active enforcement operation while resisting arrest.
That does not mean he deserved to die.
An agent called out the presence of a firearm. During the attempt to secure it, the weapon discharged before the agent could declare the scene clear. Other officers, hearing a gun call and a gunshot while a suspect was resisting arrest, reacted according to their training.
From their perspective, they were confronting an armed individual resisting arrest. That is why, immediately after the shooting, one officer urgently asked where the firearm was. He believed he had just engaged an armed suspect, because that is precisely the situation as it appeared in real time.
He did not deserve to die. However, his actions, his decisions, and his criminal interference were contributing factors, alongside serious failures by the officers involved.
I believe the shooting was unnecessary. I believe there were many alternative ways the situation could have been handled. I do not believe the officers were truly under lethal threat.
Recklessness on all sides resulted in a man losing his life.
Approximately 23 percent of ICE activity occurs in Texas, yet we do not see these outcomes there. Minnesota accounts for roughly 2 percent of ICE operations, yet has seen multiple shootings involving American citizens.
The difference is organized resistance. Blue states have coordinated efforts designed to insert civilians into active ICE operations to interfere intentionally and directly.
Interfering with law-enforcement operations is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed.
Resisting arrest is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed.
Within the Second Amendment community, there is a common saying: “I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.” It refers to choosing survival over moral victory.
That same principle applies to interactions with law enforcement.
Would you rather be right, or would you rather be alive?
Make smart decisions when dealing with law enforcement. Survive the encounter. Then take the fight to court. Use every lawful platform available to expose misconduct. Name departments, supervisors, and officers. Demand accountability through evidence and process.
But interfering with an active operation, resisting arrest, and doing so while armed creates a predictable and deadly outcome.
Was it legal for him to be armed? Yes.
Should citizens carry lawfully? Yes.
Is it profoundly reckless to interfere with law enforcement and resist arrest while armed? Absolutely.
When we carry firearms, we accept greater responsibility. That responsibility was neglected here.
It is possible to support immigration enforcement while condemning reckless policing.
It is possible to criticize law enforcement while also acknowledging the dangerous behavior of civilians.
It is possible to recognize complexity, rapid escalation, human error, and shared responsibility in a fast-moving situation.
He did not have to die.
Liberty only survives when it operates within order.
Nothing about this situation was orderly.
When order collapses, lives are lost.
He did not have to die.
A friend dating back to high school has a German life partner and spends a lot of time in Germany. Is there now and posted that he can’t take the US gestapo government anymore and is beginning the process to move there permanently. I’m like cool, you’re there now. You’re all set. He’s like no, I have to (lays out complex process of establishing permanent residency). I reply why bother with all that? You’re there now, stay. He explains that you just can’t just do that. There’s a process or you’ll get sent back. Interesting, I say.